Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 56026 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2007 04:59:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Jul 2007 04:59:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 40010 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2007 04:59:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 39960 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2007 04:59:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 39949 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jul 2007 04:59:28 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 21:59:28 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.4] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 21:59:25 -0700 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D5DC7141F0 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2007 21:59:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <16845406.1183525144484.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 21:59:04 -0700 (PDT) From: "Donald Woods (JIRA)" To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3300) Upgrade Dojo to 0.9 In-Reply-To: <30884257.1183491784486.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12510062 ] Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-3300: ---------------------------------------- I would argue that it should go into the 2.1 stream. If we have to rewrite code to migrate to 0.9, then we shouldn't break any user apps that used the 0.4.3 level we supplied in 2.0. A third digit rev shouldn't break users apps unless we had no choice due to major server problems and changing Dojo levels just to be current doesn't register as critical in my book..... > Upgrade Dojo to 0.9 > ------------------- > > Key: GERONIMO-3300 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3300 > Project: Geronimo > Issue Type: Improvement > Security Level: public(Regular issues) > Components: console > Affects Versions: 2.0-M7 > Reporter: Jay D. McHugh > Assignee: Jay D. McHugh > > The new Dojo 0.9 Beta was just released. > It will reduce the footprint of the main dojo.js to under 50k - But will require that some of the console > screens to be reworked because the widget system was completely redesigned and is incompatible. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.