Here is another option... we could branch/tag off the current impl with
mixed EJB 2.1/3.0. Just in case we want to keep it around. Then completely
deep six the 2.1 stuff in trunk.

On 7/25/07, Matt Hogstrom <matt@hogstrom.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 25, 2007, at 12:56 PM, Christopher Blythe wrote:
>
>  I think I'm swaying more towards option 1.
>
>
> Ok, I like that option.  I wouldn't worry about daytrader release relative
> to Geronimo if that was your concern about time.  If we rlelease DT 2.0 a
> month later it won't kill us.  We haven't really talked about a release for
> it as we've really only been using it for validation of G.
>



-- 
"I say never be complete, I say stop being perfect, I say let... lets
evolve, let the chips fall where they may." - Tyler Durden