geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Prasad Kashyap" <goyathlay.geron...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release javamail 1.4 specs and updated javamail provider jars.
Date Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:31:59 GMT
+1

Cheers
Prasad

On 7/16/07, Rick McGuire <rickmcg@gmail.com> wrote:
> That's what I get for cutting and pasting a previous vote as my starting
> point :-)
>
> Ok, we're voting on the following:
>
> 1)  Release 1.1 of the javamail 1.4 spec API.  The artifact in question
> is geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.1.  The current branch used to build the
> release candidate is at
>
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.1
>
> The tag will be created at
>
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.1
>
> 2)  Release 1.2 of the javamail 1.4 mail package.  This package has a
> top level pom and two child artifacts:
>
> top level pom:  geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.2
> javamail providers:  geroinimo_javamail_1.4_provider-1.2
> javamail mail:    geroinimo_javamail_1.4_mail-1.2
>
> The geroinimo_javamail_1.4_mail-1.2 artifact is the uber-jar containing
> the merged spec and provider class files.  The source used to build this
> is located at
>
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/branches/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.2
>
> The tag will be created at
>
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.2
>
>
> Kevan Miller wrote:
> >
> > On Jul 16, 2007, at 7:27 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> >
> >> Axis2 encountered a javamail bug in the the spec code almost
> >> immediately after the 1.0 version was released, so we needed to spin
> >> a new release of the javamail artifacts.  This will also require a
> >> new released of the provider and mail artifacts to picked up the new
> >> spec version.
> >> Please review the specifications located at
> >> http://people.apache.org/~rickmcguire/releases/
> >>
> >> Voting concludes on Thursday, July 19th at 1000 ET.
> >
> > Rick,
> > I know that you are following recent voting techniques. However, I'm
> > finding this technique lacking... This vote does not precisely record
> > the spec names and versions that we're voting on. The tar.gz files in
> > your account on people and likely to disappear in a few
> > weeks/months... I have a few requests:
> >
> > 1. Please record the precise names and versions that we're voting on
> > (e.g. geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.1)
> > 2. Provide svn urls to the current source and where the tag will be
> > created.
> >
> > --kevan
> >
>
>

Mime
View raw message