geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David Jencks (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-1393) Add test of EAR/WAR security options
Date Tue, 31 Jul 2007 00:39:52 GMT


David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-1393:

Maybe these or something like them could be run against the new testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests

> Add test of EAR/WAR security options
> ------------------------------------
>                 Key: GERONIMO-1393
>                 URL:
>             Project: Geronimo
>          Issue Type: Test
>      Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
>          Components: deployment, security
>    Affects Versions: 1.0
>            Reporter: Aaron Mulder
>             Fix For: 1.x
>         Attachments: ear-plan-no-realm-ear-security.xml, ear-plan-no-realm-no-security.xml,
ear-plan-war-realm-ear-security.xml, ear-plan-war-realm-no-security.xml
> If we someday have a place to run deployment tests against a running server, here are
some plans that might come in handy.  These can be used with an EAR wrapped around the LDAP-demo
WAR (which I renamed to test-web.war for this case),
> The test should try deploying that EAR with each of these plans in turn.  The expected
results are:
> ear-plan-no-realm-ear-security.xml: Fail with error
> ear-plan-no-realm-no-security.xml: Fail with error
> ear-plan-war-realm-no-security.xml: Fail with error
> ear-plan-war-realm-ear-security.xml: Deploy successfully
> To pass, there must be a security-realm-name element in the WAR and a security element
in either the EAR or the WAR.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message