geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul McMahan <>
Subject Re: Tomcat connectors
Date Mon, 30 Jul 2007 14:01:08 GMT
FYI -- I'm working on fixing the console's web connector portlet for  
the new WebManager apis added to support these new connectors.

Best wishes,

On Jul 25, 2007, at 1:43 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:

> Ok I added a whole bunch of new connectors in the o.a.g.t.connectors
> package.
> I am still working on APR - more notes to follow on this as its a  
> little
> squirly since the Tomcat Connector somewhat "chooses" this  
> automatically
> based on the existence of a native libraries.  For the console we may
> wish to do a check on whether the native libs exist, and if so,  
> present
> the APR connector.  More on this in another email.
> Here are the connectors we care about at the moment...
> AJP13ConnectorGBean - Implements AJP
> Http11ConnectorGBean - Implements blocking Http connector
> Https11ConnectorGBean  - Implements blocking Https connector
> Http11NIOConnectorGBean - Implements non-blocking Http connector
> Https11NIOConnectorGBean - Implements non-blocking Https connector
> I have not wired them into the container and other GBeans yet...I want
> to clena them up and get any feedback before making the switch since
> this obviously will impact the console upon wiring them in.
> As a side note...I am not using any references to the WebManager or
> other interfaces we used that hooked into the console.  We can re-add
> those if those are deemed necessary.
> Jeff
> Paul McMahan wrote:
>> I agree NIO support would be great to have in 2.0, especially  
>> since its
>> required for comet.
>> Best wishes,
>> Paul
>> On Jul 23, 2007, at 2:42 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I was going through some JIRAs and the Geronimo2.0 source and  
>>> noticed it
>>> will be difficult at best to get the NIO connector and setting
>>> attributes on the APR connector for Tomcat due to its current
>>> implementation.  I really think the ability to use these 2  
>>> connectors is
>>> very important for the 2.0 release and I would like to put these  
>>> in.  If
>>> there are no objections, I would like this to be a part of the 2.0
>>> release.
>>> Jeff

View raw message