geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Donald Woods <dwo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release javamail 1.4 specs and updated javamail provider jars.
Date Mon, 16 Jul 2007 19:01:38 GMT
+1


Donald

Rick McGuire wrote:
> That's what I get for cutting and pasting a previous vote as my starting 
> point :-)
> 
> Ok, we're voting on the following:
> 
> 1)  Release 1.1 of the javamail 1.4 spec API.  The artifact in question 
> is geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.1.  The current branch used to build the 
> release candidate is at
> 
>    
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.1

> 
> 
> The tag will be created at
> 
>    
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.1 
> 
> 
> 2)  Release 1.2 of the javamail 1.4 mail package.  This package has a 
> top level pom and two child artifacts:
> 
> top level pom:  geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.2
> javamail providers:  geroinimo_javamail_1.4_provider-1.2
> javamail mail:    geroinimo_javamail_1.4_mail-1.2
> 
> The geroinimo_javamail_1.4_mail-1.2 artifact is the uber-jar containing 
> the merged spec and provider class files.  The source used to build this 
> is located at
> 
>    
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/branches/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.2

> 
> 
> The tag will be created at
> 
>    
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.2 
> 
> 
> 
> Kevan Miller wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 16, 2007, at 7:27 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>>
>>> Axis2 encountered a javamail bug in the the spec code almost 
>>> immediately after the 1.0 version was released, so we needed to spin 
>>> a new release of the javamail artifacts.  This will also require a 
>>> new released of the provider and mail artifacts to picked up the new 
>>> spec version.
>>> Please review the specifications located at
>>> http://people.apache.org/~rickmcguire/releases/
>>>
>>> Voting concludes on Thursday, July 19th at 1000 ET.
>>
>> Rick,
>> I know that you are following recent voting techniques. However, I'm 
>> finding this technique lacking... This vote does not precisely record 
>> the spec names and versions that we're voting on. The tar.gz files in 
>> your account on people and likely to disappear in a few 
>> weeks/months... I have a few requests:
>>
>> 1. Please record the precise names and versions that we're voting on 
>> (e.g. geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.1)
>> 2. Provide svn urls to the current source and where the tag will be 
>> created.
>>
>> --kevan
>>
> 
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message