geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Donald Woods <dwo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] 2.0 Release Criteria
Date Mon, 09 Jul 2007 17:24:33 GMT
What's the status of a new Tomcat release before we release 2.0?

We still have the private patches/build from GERONIMO-3010/3206 and another 
bug opened by Vamsi in GERONIMO-3273.


-Donald

Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> We've gone through the CTS grind and came out victorious 
> http://java.sun.com/javaee/overview/compatibility.jsp
> 
> OpenEJB has moved to TopLevel and CXF has certified and Axis 2 is 
> working that way too.
> 
> All in all its been an excellent six months.
> 
> So, what are we going to do for 2.0 and getting it out the door?
> 
> Here are my thoughts and we can use this thread to gather everyone 
> else's and come to a consensus.
> 
> 2.0 Ship Criteria
> Date:  mid to end of July (a target only...depends on content)
> 
> Certified Assemblies
> Tomcat, Axis 2 and OpenJPA
> Jetty, CXF and OpenJPA
> 
> Other assemblies would be the minimal assemblies but cert doesn't apply 
> to them.
> 
> Work on fit and finish stuff (cleaning up error messages, improving 
> diagnostics, reducing footprint).
> 
> Personally, I'd like to see the full G have a footprint of about 40MB 
> (that's a little over 5MB larger than 1.1.1) and Minimal be around 
> 20MB.  Need to do some research on this (volunteers?)
> 
> I'm not sure how the WADI clustering presents itself across the two 
> different assemblies (Gianny, comments?)
> 
> Post 2.0 Items
> 
> What to do about OSGi?  Seems like there has been discussion but no real 
> movement in this area.
> Flexible Server (there has been some discussion on the list about 
> allowing users without a PhD in G to create their own custom assemblies.
> Would be neat to Create a minimal assemblie that included ServiceMix for 
> a lightweight ESB endpoint
> Better monitoring and diagnosis
> 
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message