geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Vamsavardhana Reddy" <c1vams...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Adding a "Tech Preview" portlet group in Admin Console in G 2.0
Date Mon, 30 Jul 2007 06:49:56 GMT
On 7/30/07, Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 28, 2007, at 1:41 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/28/07, Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Jul 26, 2007, at 1:21 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
> >
> > How about adding a "Tech Preview" portlet group in Admin Console in G
> > 2.0 where we can include the portlets (for e.g., the "Create Plan"
> > portlet Shiva is working on.  See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3254
> > ) for which user feedback will play a great role in improving those
> > further.  Once we decide on whether to retain those or not, we can either
> > move them out to a different group or remove them from Admin Console
> > accordingly.
> >
> >
> > Some of the new pluggable console support would have helped, here. But
> > that's not going into 2.0. Personally, sounds like this should go into
> > trunk, if it's not ready... Can still get good feedback...
> >
> > --kevan
> >
>
>
> The idea is that if these portlets go in as part of a release with
> binaries readily available for download, we have a better chance of getting
> more users to try the portlets and possibly provide some feedback too in the
> linked wiki pages.  If it goes only into trunk, the users will still have to
> build the binaries from trunk, which they may not want to/may not succeed
> due to some reason or the other.
>
>
> Yes, I understood the idea.
>
> If a committer thinks that this code is ready and wants to commit it, then
> why isn't it in trunk? If it was in trunk, then we could evaluate and
> discuss getting it into branches/2.0. I'm currently doubtful that it should
> go into 2.0...
>

I forgot to ask in my last reply...
Matt,

does any new stuff going into branches\2.0 come in the way of release
schedules or sorts at this point?

Vamsi


--kevan
>
>
>
>

Mime
View raw message