geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul McMahan <>
Subject Re: [jira] Created: (GERONIMO-3348) java.lang.NoSuchMethodError in org.springframework.context.i18n.LocaleContextHolder
Date Tue, 31 Jul 2007 13:21:11 GMT
On Jul 31, 2007, at 8:44 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:

> I'm running some TCK tests, now. Assuming things look good, I'd  
> like to commit to 2.0. Any objections? We could do nothing and  
> require users to create a geronimo deployment plan which hides  
> these same classes, instead. However, I'd like to make this  
> scenario work out-of-the-box...

+1   I agree this would be good for 2.0.  Pluto 1.2 uses spring to  
configure itself so I experienced some of these problems first hand  
while setting up the new dynamic console framework.  Like you say, in  
most cases users can probably work around it with hidden-class  
filters or arranging their modules in a certain way.  But that's not  
entirely straight forward and can limit their options with respect to  
how their application can be deployed.  Spring applications should  
work out of the box.

Best wishes,

View raw message