geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Prasad Kashyap" <goyathlay.geron...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Atkins for Geronimo - was Re: [DISCUSS] 2.0 Release Criteria
Date Thu, 28 Jun 2007 15:54:54 GMT
Yeah.. That is what I had last night. But it had many duplicates.
Maybe I should go back to that version

Cheers
Prasad

On 6/28/07, Donald Woods <dwoods@apache.org> wrote:
> Better, but can you create a table that excludes the version?
> That would allow us to compare similar artifacts, like
>     repository/org/codehaus/castor/castor
> which would show us any growth between Castor 0.9.5.3 to 1.0.5.
>
> -Donald
>
> Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> > Here is a spreadsheet of the comparison between the disk usage (du -k)
> > values of v1.2 and v2.0.
> >
> > http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pZVJhnHN3LjuF5FjgmXnrRQ&gid=0
> >
> > There are 2 sheets. The first sheet stops at the ${version} dir in the
> > repo structure. The 2nd sheet goes all the way into the repo tree.
> >
> > It's a google spreadsheet. I don't know how I can share this so that
> > all can edit it. But just ask me and I will give you permission.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Prasad
> >
> > On 6/28/07, Jay D. McHugh <jay@joyfulnoisewebdesign.com> wrote:
> >> You are right Prasad,
> >>
> >> I messed something up when I was building my tables.
> >> "repository/geronimo" is in the installed directory but not in my
> >> database.
> >>
> >> I'll rebuild the table and see what comes out.  Also, I'll 'map' the
> >> "repository/geronimo" to "repository/org/apache/geronimo" so that the
> >> table makes sense.
> >>
> >>
> >> Jay
> >>
> >> Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> >> > Matt, Jay,
> >> >
> >> > The repository shifted from repository/geronimo to repository/o.a.g
> >> > from v1.2 onwards. We'd have to compare it against that directory to
> >> > get a good picture.. I added the same comments to your wiki page.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDEV/Installed+size+comparison+%281.1.1%2C+1.2%2C+2.0%29?focusedCommentId=60511#comment-60511
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Please check out a similar comparison between just 1.2 and 2.0.
> >> > http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pZVJhnHN3LjuF5FjgmXnrRQ
> >> >
> >> > This can be tuned further.
> >> >
> >> > Cheers
> >> > Prasad
> >> >
> >> > On 6/27/07, Matt Hogstrom <matt@hogstrom.org> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On Jun 26, 2007, at 10:57 PM, Jay D. McHugh wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > In order to (hopefully) simplify finding where the increase in
> >> >> > footprint size comes from, I made a new page on the wiki:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/TOw
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Jay
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Jay, this is excellent.  Clearly the pesky repository is a major
> >> >> contributor.  It is interesting that the growth from 1.1.1 to 1.2 and
> >> >> beyond.  I'm wondering if the Maven transient dependencies have
> >> >> anything to do with this ?
> >> >>
> >> >> >> Me ! Me ! Me !
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Cheers
> >> >> >> Prasad
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
>

Mime
View raw message