geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Prasad Kashyap" <goyathlay.geron...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Can we conclude the Vote on WS-META-Data early? --- Please resond if you object
Date Fri, 15 Jun 2007 01:28:38 GMT
I apologize for the confusion with the version number in the <scm> of
the ws-metadata in rc2.

I have corrected it and refreshed the bundle.

Cheers
Prasad

On 6/14/07, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com> wrote:
> As noted elsewhere I found some documentation on the expected release
> procedure and it isn't quite what I remembered.
>
> I'm fine with releasing either ws-metadata 1.1.1 spec jar, although
> unless someone can convince me that the scm info in the rc2 one will
> be correct I'd prefer to release the first one that is missing scm info.
>
> +1 to one or the other 1.1.1 ws-metadata jar.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> On Jun 14, 2007, at 11:22 AM, David Jencks wrote<
>
> > I don't understand the release process for specs to tell what is
> > going on, however there is no https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/
> > geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.1 (what i'd
> > expect a 1.1.1 to be under) nor a https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/
> > geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1 (what is
> > actually shown in the newly added scm info).  IMO its slightly
> > better to have no information rather than wrong information.
> >
> > At this point I'm
> > +0 on releasing the original (no scm info) ws-metadata 1.1.1 jar
> > -0 on releasing the modified one.
> >
> > Keeping track of the spec release procedure is beyond my limited
> > abilities, but what is happening is not what I expected.  My dim
> > recollections of the release procedure was that we would use the
> > maven release plugin and that would correctly tag the source and
> > generate/modify all the artifacts consistent with the new tag.  I'm
> > confused because there is no 1.1.1 tag that I can find for ws
> > metadata and the scm info does not appear to be getting updated.
> > Is this a maven bug, is it not supposed to be updated by the
> > release plugin, or something else?
> >
> > thanks
> > david jencks
> >
> > On Jun 14, 2007, at 8:21 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> >
> >> CXF is looking to cut their release starting on Friday and they
> >> need the WS-MetaData spec.  Originally this was approved except it
> >> was missing the SCM tag.  Prasad added that but this puts this
> >> particular spec being released after their date.  It would be
> >> really helpful if we could approve this spec by tomorrow
> >> (Friday).  Anyone opposed or have a comment on how to handle this?
> >>
> >> On Jun 13, 2007, at 5:13 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> >>
> >>> Please review the specifications located at
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc2
> >>>
> >>> The only changes that were made to the binaries that passed a vote
> >>> over the past weekend was to add the scm section to the pom.xml.
> >>>
> >>> I have dropped jsp specs from the vote now.
> >>>
> >>> ws-metadata will have a 3 digit version number (1.1.1) because 1.1.0
> >>> was already released some 6 weeks ago. This is a minor update to the
> >>> released version.
> >>>
> >>> Voting concludes on Saturday, June 16th at 1700 ET.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers
> >>> Prasad
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>

Mime
View raw message