geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Hogstrom <m...@hogstrom.org>
Subject Re: Atkins for Geronimo - was Re: [DISCUSS] 2.0 Release Criteria
Date Thu, 28 Jun 2007 12:25:41 GMT
Great work ... I'll sniff both.  Anything pop out at y'all from this  
exercise ?

On Jun 27, 2007, at 11:04 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:

> Matt, Jay,
>
> The repository shifted from repository/geronimo to repository/o.a.g
> from v1.2 onwards. We'd have to compare it against that directory to
> get a good picture.. I added the same comments to your wiki page.
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDEV/Installed+size 
> +comparison+%281.1.1%2C+1.2%2C+2.0%29? 
> focusedCommentId=60511#comment-60511
>
> Please check out a similar comparison between just 1.2 and 2.0.
> http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pZVJhnHN3LjuF5FjgmXnrRQ
>
> This can be tuned further.
>
> Cheers
> Prasad
>
> On 6/27/07, Matt Hogstrom <matt@hogstrom.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 26, 2007, at 10:57 PM, Jay D. McHugh wrote:
>>
>> > In order to (hopefully) simplify finding where the increase in
>> > footprint size comes from, I made a new page on the wiki:
>> >
>> > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/TOw
>> >
>> > Jay
>> >>
>>
>> Jay, this is excellent.  Clearly the pesky repository is a major
>> contributor.  It is interesting that the growth from 1.1.1 to 1.2 and
>> beyond.  I'm wondering if the Maven transient dependencies have
>> anything to do with this ?
>>
>> >> Me ! Me ! Me !
>> >>
>> >> Cheers
>> >> Prasad
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>


Mime
View raw message