geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Jencks <>
Subject Re: Can we conclude the Vote on WS-META-Data early? --- Please resond if you object
Date Thu, 14 Jun 2007 21:10:57 GMT
As noted elsewhere I found some documentation on the expected release  
procedure and it isn't quite what I remembered.

I'm fine with releasing either ws-metadata 1.1.1 spec jar, although  
unless someone can convince me that the scm info in the rc2 one will  
be correct I'd prefer to release the first one that is missing scm info.

+1 to one or the other 1.1.1 ws-metadata jar.

david jencks

On Jun 14, 2007, at 11:22 AM, David Jencks wrote:

> I don't understand the release process for specs to tell what is  
> going on, however there is no 
> geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.1 (what i'd  
> expect a 1.1.1 to be under) nor a 
> geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1 (what is  
> actually shown in the newly added scm info).  IMO its slightly  
> better to have no information rather than wrong information.
> At this point I'm
> +0 on releasing the original (no scm info) ws-metadata 1.1.1 jar
> -0 on releasing the modified one.
> Keeping track of the spec release procedure is beyond my limited  
> abilities, but what is happening is not what I expected.  My dim  
> recollections of the release procedure was that we would use the  
> maven release plugin and that would correctly tag the source and  
> generate/modify all the artifacts consistent with the new tag.  I'm  
> confused because there is no 1.1.1 tag that I can find for ws  
> metadata and the scm info does not appear to be getting updated.   
> Is this a maven bug, is it not supposed to be updated by the  
> release plugin, or something else?
> thanks
> david jencks
> On Jun 14, 2007, at 8:21 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>> CXF is looking to cut their release starting on Friday and they  
>> need the WS-MetaData spec.  Originally this was approved except it  
>> was missing the SCM tag.  Prasad added that but this puts this  
>> particular spec being released after their date.  It would be  
>> really helpful if we could approve this spec by tomorrow  
>> (Friday).  Anyone opposed or have a comment on how to handle this?
>> On Jun 13, 2007, at 5:13 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
>>> Please review the specifications located at
>>> The only changes that were made to the binaries that passed a vote
>>> over the past weekend was to add the scm section to the pom.xml.
>>> I have dropped jsp specs from the vote now.
>>> ws-metadata will have a 3 digit version number (1.1.1) because 1.1.0
>>> was already released some 6 weeks ago. This is a minor update to the
>>> released version.
>>> Voting concludes on Saturday, June 16th at 1700 ET.
>>> Cheers
>>> Prasad

View raw message