geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gianny Damour <>
Subject Re: Nearing testing complete ... what should the release name be and next steps
Date Sat, 02 Jun 2007 00:28:07 GMT
On 01/06/2007, at 3:56 AM, David Jencks wrote:

> On May 31, 2007, at 9:53 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>> There has been lots of work going on to get Geronimo 2.0 certified  
>> and it seems like the light at the end of the tunnel is not an  
>> oncoming train but the other side :)  With that we're also at the  
>> point of cutting a milestone since we're at the end of May.  Given  
>> that all possible assemblies won't be fully tested what do folks  
>> think about the name of the release and what will it contain?   
>> Also, when is a branch appropriate?
>> I was thinking geronimo-tomcat-jee5-2.0-M6.  This would include  
>> Tomcat, CXF and OpenJPA as the components.  The M6 indicates a  
>> work in progress but allows us to claim a specific release as  
>> certified and allows us to continue knocking off the corners for  
>> performance, footprint, etc.
> Why not also a jetty assembly?  Unless there are really significant  
> problems I'd be in favor of waiting a couple days and getting both  
> platforms out at the same time.

I am also in favor of a simultaneous release of Jetty and Tomcat  


>> It would also seem about right to branch into branches/2.0 at this  
>> time as we finish the other work.
>> What do others think?
> I have a significant security refactoring I've been working on that  
> I would like to get into the next 2.0 official whatever (milestone,  
> snapshot, release...) since it is not backwards compatible.  It  
> affects how default subjects and run-as subjects are constructed  
> and will finish the JACC plugability work.  I'll try to get  
> something out today describing how it works in more detail.
> thanks
> david jencks
>> Matt

View raw message