geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hernan Cunico <hcun...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] 2.0 Release Criteria
Date Fri, 22 Jun 2007 12:53:18 GMT
We have done that in the past and then put it back again. IIRC the ldap bits were under 1 mb.

Cheers!
Hernan

Donald Woods wrote:
> For footprint, we could shave 4-5MB by removing ApacheDS and a couple 
> sample apps that are getting installed.  Given there is a ApacheDS 1.0 
> and 1.5 release stream, we should move this out to the 
> geronimo/plugins/trunk and allow users to choose which level they want 
> to install from our plugin site.....
> 
> 
> -Donald
> 
> Jay D. McHugh wrote:
>> I agree that 'fit and finish' and tooling are probably the most 
>> important things to clean up before the final 2.0.0 release.
>>
>> As far as footprint - on my system, tomcat-jee5 is about 75M 
>> installed.  Getting this down to 40M seems like a huge task to try to 
>> accomplish before releasing.  When we added Dojo to the server, that 
>> was an additional 6M right there - So maybe trying to cut 20-25M 
>> rather than 35M would be more realistic.
>>
>> Jay
>>
>> Jacek Laskowski wrote:
>>> On 6/21/07, Matt Hogstrom <matt@hogstrom.org> wrote:
>>>> We've gone through the CTS grind and came out victorious http://
>>>> java.sun.com/javaee/overview/compatibility.jsp
>>>>
>>>> OpenEJB has moved to TopLevel and CXF has certified and Axis 2 is
>>>> working that way too.
>>>>
>>>> All in all its been an excellent six months.
>>>>
>>>> So, what are we going to do for 2.0 and getting it out the door?
>>>
>>> I think you narrowed it down to the acceptable minimum and the sooner
>>> Geronimo 2.0 sees the light the better. No need to wait for anything
>>> else but bugs and only those that prevent us from releasing Geronimo.
>>> I know that having a Java EE 5 certified release as RC is not a good
>>> option for many people. A Java EE 5 certified and final release is
>>> what people seem to be waiting for - me at very least.
>>>
>>> Of course, tooling is another factor why people would choose Geronimo
>>> over...ekhm...other app servers so Eclipse and NetBeans support with
>>> M2 plugins would be a great bonus to offer. Eclipse plugin is almost
>>> ready whereas NetBeans IDE...hmm....more to come soon. I had some
>>> minor issues with geronimo m2 plugin so when Geronimo gets appropriate
>>> attention being able to boot up a fully Java EE 5 certified
>>> application server and test out ears is another differentiator. So,
>>> let's polish it and put on the shelves...asap - 07/15 the very least.
>>>
>>> Jacek
>>>
>>
>>

Mime
View raw message