geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hernan Cunico <>
Subject Re: Nearing testing complete ... what should the release name be and next steps
Date Fri, 01 Jun 2007 21:34:26 GMT
Agreed, let's keep releasing early and often.
I'll start looking into the release notes, will shoot a separate email on this.


Joe Bohn wrote:
> Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>> There has been lots of work going on to get Geronimo 2.0 certified and 
>> it seems like the light at the end of the tunnel is not an oncoming 
>> train but the other side :)  With that we're also at the point of 
>> cutting a milestone since we're at the end of May.  Given that all 
>> possible assemblies won't be fully tested what do folks think about 
>> the name of the release and what will it contain?  Also, when is a 
>> branch appropriate?
>> I was thinking geronimo-tomcat-jee5-2.0-M6.  This would include 
>> Tomcat, CXF and OpenJPA as the components.  The M6 indicates a work in 
>> progress but allows us to claim a specific release as certified and 
>> allows us to continue knocking off the corners for performance, 
>> footprint, etc.
>> It would also seem about right to branch into branches/2.0 at this 
>> time as we finish the other work.
>> What do others think?
> I think this makes sense.  We need a release to reference for 
> certification but there are probably enough issues in other areas that 
> we wouldn't want to make it a full blown release.  Using M6 let's us get 
> something out there for folks to work with and also communicates that 
> there are still some rough edges.
> Joe

View raw message