Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 63450 invoked from network); 29 May 2007 15:17:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 May 2007 15:17:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 45109 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2007 15:17:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 44884 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2007 15:17:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 44873 invoked by uid 99); 29 May 2007 15:17:18 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 May 2007 08:17:18 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of goyathlay.geronimo@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.170 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.170] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 May 2007 08:17:13 -0700 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 70so924280ugb for ; Tue, 29 May 2007 08:16:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=MMyf8pelVvNUhyiHaarzADj1xx7BudnIbNifZaDaL69X8X1pWtExkyC29x4j7gL4zJ/2TZO3YPgk3m0fxaL+0a0xeMLWZQoCmyPIGPRo7eoFx5gZmXFC/xwkQoCZ5s5wXr2Wjz7mGZFK1G+1scHGDtvtEQvbxoRT+UgAzHoIfsA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=kmIHRjL2ogWqfaJAG7Yr8njKStxqieKwDw79H+UpsMdm88V4dVKWJNglR9CyyqJKnGKLcTb+mSCpK0Nkyb0bodPMRM3Su0kcJzgXkwwpVcq9QCv67NR7f8f112raoP9zroZalS12PQriX5JZ53yFuWZ1iIZEUKUcYjUG+0HsDQQ= Received: by 10.82.147.6 with SMTP id u6mr12815880bud.1180451811927; Tue, 29 May 2007 08:16:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.141.5 with HTTP; Tue, 29 May 2007 08:16:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 11:16:51 -0400 From: "Prasad Kashyap" To: "Geronimo Dev" Subject: Naming conflict when deploying testsupport EARs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Not too long ago (say around M2-M3), I was able to deploy 2 different testsupport EARs (test-ear-j2ee-1.3.ear and test-ear-j2ee-1.4.ear) simultaneously on Geronimo. But now, a naming conflict in OpenEJB seems to preclude one for the other. I get the following exception on deploying the 2nd EAR Caused by: org.apache.openejb.DuplicateDeploymentIdException: ejb.jar/SimpleStatelessSession: ejb.jar/SimpleStatefulSession: ejb.jar/SimpleBMPEntity: ejb.jar/SimpleCMPEntity Now the question is, has the design and code changed as expected and thus the testcase needs to change ? Or is this a bug we have introduced in G ? Cheers Prasad