geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hernan Cunico <>
Subject Re: web site update
Date Wed, 02 May 2007 14:01:05 GMT
Jason Dillon wrote:
> Um... why?
> That mens for each release we have a duplicate image?  That is crazy 
not really, wasn't your point to have a unique image for each release page? maybe I didn't

> man.  Thats like saying that each page has the banner image attached to 
> it, though admittedly that is much worse, but its along the same lines 
> as what you are suggesting.

right, there is no point in copying the very same image over and over again, so there is clearly
a misunderstanding here.

If we are going to use just one image (independent of the Geronimo version) on each release
page then we definitively point to the same spot where we have the banners and logos on the
However, if we want to have for each release page a new Geronimo box with a matching version
number, then we should to attach each of those images to the corresponding release page. This
is the approach I thought we were talking about. If we go this way then we need to come up
with a kind of standard way to create that image, today we are missing 1.0 and 1.1.1.

> If you recall I originally setup this image to pull from a URL and not 
> from an attachment... and I think it should make its way back to that.
> --jason
> On May 2, 2007, at 6:40 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
>> I think we should be consistent in the way we manage the attachments 
>> with confluence. I rather have them attached to corresponding release 
>> page. There are not that many to copy over anyway.
>> Cheers!
>> Hernan
>> Jason Dillon wrote:
>>> We should just add these to the static files we put into the site and 
>>> use an http link here.  Especially if we are going to have 
>>> per-release pages, we don't want to duplicate those images over and 
>>> over.
>>> Should just svn cp them from site/trunk/art into 
>>> site/trunk/docs/images...
>>> --jason
>>> On May 2, 2007, at 6:12 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
>>>> yeah, that is the autoexported version, the one on confluence (the 
>>>> source!?) looks fine. The autoexport plugin doesn't see attachment 
>>>> updates so those files need to be deleted manually
>>>> I already opened a JIRA (INFRA-1226) to remove that file so I can 
>>>> export manually the space and finally get that image updated.
>>>> Cheers!
>>>> Hernan
>>>> Jason Dillon wrote:
>>>>> Hey, I just noticed that the box has some weird looking border on 
>>>>> the top+left... any idea where that came from?
>>>>> --jason
>>>>> On May 1, 2007, at 1:53 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
>>>>>> Let's do it!
>>>>>> I'll start moving some pages around. Do we have a "Geronimo Box"

>>>>>> without any specific version? 
>>>>>> (

>>>>>> Cheers!
>>>>>> Hernan
>>>>>> Sachin Patel wrote:
>>>>>>> +1.
>>>>>>> -sachin
>>>>>>> On May 1, 2007, at 4:21 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>>>>>>>> I'd still like to see things organized in the same way that

>>>>>>>> AcitveMQ does:

View raw message