Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 8247 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2007 18:31:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Apr 2007 18:31:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 94764 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2007 18:31:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 94716 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2007 18:31:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 94590 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2007 18:31:11 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Apr 2007 11:31:10 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.202.165.99] (HELO smtpauth05.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net) (64.202.165.99) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 03 Apr 2007 11:31:01 -0700 Received: (qmail 27028 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2007 18:30:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (129.33.49.251) by smtpauth05.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.99) with ESMTP; 03 Apr 2007 18:30:40 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) In-Reply-To: <09C45F0A-10D2-4200-B59B-E54143FA0288@yahoo.com> References: <1b5bfeb50704030055n1ded447el9c0a088cebc01675@mail.gmail.com> <1f52a95c0704030257k156271cas12bdb37338138c5@mail.gmail.com> <09C45F0A-10D2-4200-B59B-E54143FA0288@yahoo.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-13--250656571 Message-Id: From: Matt Hogstrom Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] 2.0-M4 Binaries available (rc1) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 14:30:38 -0400 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-13--250656571 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Can't argue with #2. I can't see how these got picked up and it is sloppy. I'm ok with knocking this set of binaries down. Although, I'm not sure I want to invest more time on this milestone as there are lots of functional pieces to fix. Anyone else want to put together an M4 or shall we pass this month? On Apr 3, 2007, at 1:51 PM, David Jencks wrote: > I'm -1 on releasing as is because of (2). I think our binaries > should be cleaner that that :-/ > > I don't think (1) is significant. There is no functional change > from applying the patch from GERONIMO-2941. > (3) also doesn't bother me. > > thanks > david jencks > > On Apr 3, 2007, at 2:57 AM, Rakesh Midha wrote: > >> I think we need to look into following issues: >> 1. Initial startup error caused by https://issues.apache.org/jira/ >> browse/GERONIMO-2941 >> >> 2. Why is that in console's Application section and deployment >> list-module, I see all the modules twice? >> One with the version 2.0-M4, appears as started and one with >> version 2.0-M4-SNAPSHOT stopped. All the modules also have two >> folders for two versions. >> Its not causing any error or exception, but i am just worried as >> this result in larger size of zip/gz and installed folder, and may >> also have other effects. >> >> 3. Shutdown error. >> >> thanks >> Rakesh >> >> >> On 4/3/07, Jacek Laskowski wrote: >> +1 >> >> Jacek >> >> On 4/1/07, Matt Hogstrom < matt@hogstrom.org> wrote: >> > I have placed the 2.0-M4 binaries out on http://people.apache.org/ >> > ~hogstrom/2.0-M4-rc1 for you to take a look at. (They are >> uploading >> > as I write this). >> > >> > I have done some testing with DayTrader. There is an issue in >> > connecting with he MDB container which still needs to be worked out >> > so the application will not deploy as is. However, given the >> scopwe >> > of function DayTrader covers as well as all the late code drops I >> > don't see an issue with that. Smaller samples should be ok and >> tests >> > look good. Given that we're in the final stages of testing I'd >> like >> > to get this Milestone on the wire as is and fix issues in trunk. >> > Users that pull this binary and report issues will help us in the >> > Drive to 5. >> > >> > Other than that limitation I think this Milestone looks ready to >> go. >> > >> > After reviewing the content please cast your vote. >> > >> > [ ] +1 - Release these binaries >> > [ ] 0 >> > [ ] -1 Do not release these binaries (provide reason) >> > >> > This vote will conclude on April 4th at 0600 Eastern. >> > >> > Thanks! >> > >> >> >> -- >> Jacek Laskowski >> http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl >> > --Apple-Mail-13--250656571 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Can't argue with #2.=A0 I = can't see how these got picked up and it is sloppy.=A0 I'm ok with = knocking this set of binaries down.=A0 Although, I'm not sure I want to = invest more time on this milestone as there are lots of functional = pieces to fix.=A0=A0

Anyone else want to put = together an M4 or shall we pass this month?



On Apr 3, 2007, at = 1:51 PM, David Jencks wrote:

I'm -1 on = releasing as is because of (2).=A0 I think our binaries should be = cleaner that that :-/

I don't think (1) is = significant.=A0 There is no functional change from applying the patch = from GERONIMO-2941.
(3) also doesn't bother me.

thanks
david = jencks

On Apr 3, 2007, at 2:57 AM, Rakesh Midha = wrote:

I think we need to look into following issues:
1. = Initial startup error caused by https://issue= s.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2941

2. Why is that in = console's Application section and deployment list-module, I see all the = modules twice?
One with the version 2.0-M4, appears as started and = one with version 2.0-M4-SNAPSHOT stopped. All the modules also have two = folders for two versions.
Its not causing any error or exception, but = i am just worried as this result in larger size of zip/gz and installed = folder, and may also have other effects.

3. Shutdown = error.

thanks
Rakesh


On 4/3/07, Jacek = Laskowski <jacek@laskowski.net.pl > = wrote:
+1

Jacek

On 4/1/07, Matt Hogstrom < matt@hogstrom.org> = wrote:
> I have placed the 2.0-M4 binaries out on http://people.apache.org/
> = ~hogstrom/2.0-M4-rc1 for you to take a look at.=A0=A0(They are uploading =
> as I write this).
>
> I have done some testing with = DayTrader.=A0=A0There is an issue in
> connecting with he MDB = container which still needs to be worked out
> so the application = will not deploy as is.=A0=A0However, given the scopwe
> of = function DayTrader covers as well as all the late code drops I
> = don't see an issue with that.=A0=A0Smaller samples should be ok and = tests
> look good.=A0=A0Given that we're in the final stages of = testing I'd like
> to get this Milestone on the wire as is and = fix issues in trunk.
> Users that pull this binary and report = issues will help us in the
> Drive to 5.
>
> Other = than that limitation I think this Milestone looks ready to go. =
>
> After reviewing the content please cast your = vote.
>
> [ ] +1 - Release these binaries
> [ ]=A0=A0 = 0
> [ ] -1 Do not release these binaries (provide = reason)
>
> This vote will conclude on April 4th at 0600 = Eastern.
>
> Thanks!
>


--
Jacek = Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
=


= --Apple-Mail-13--250656571--