Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 58510 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2007 12:51:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Apr 2007 12:51:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 54053 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2007 12:51:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 54011 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2007 12:51:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 53998 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2007 12:51:16 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.68.5.16] (HELO relay02.pair.com) (209.68.5.16) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 03 Apr 2007 05:51:12 -0700 Received: (qmail 46552 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2007 12:49:43 -0000 Received: from 216.254.115.225 (HELO a1.p2security.net) (216.254.115.225) by relay02.pair.com with SMTP; 3 Apr 2007 12:49:43 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 216.254.115.225 Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20070403084215.036c6eb8@p2sec.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6 Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 08:49:40 -0400 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org From: Ken Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3054) org.apache.geronimo.util.jce.X509V1CertificateGenerator appears to be deprecated with no replacement In-Reply-To: <31242445.1175602773408.JavaMail.jira@brutus> References: <18552830.1175374645323.JavaMail.jira@brutus> <31242445.1175602773408.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Matt, thanks very much for your reply. There may be an issue, with importing a PKCS7 key and its cert chain, but before I brought it up I wanted to make sure I had the latest (read: not deprecated) file. Was this a clean pull from Bouncy Castle? I can't tell because it is packaged with the org.apache namespace instead of the org.bouncycastle namespace. I'm guessing you guys just did a refactor to change the namespace? The latest BouncyCastle release has org.bouncycastle.x509.X509V1CertificateGenerator, which seems to be correct... -Ken At 08:19 AM 4/3/2007, you wrote: > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3054?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12486338 > ] > >Matt Hogstrom commented on GERONIMO-3054: >----------------------------------------- > >Many of these files came from Bouncy Castle. We had to break them >apart as there was an issue with the Bouncy Castle jars shipping a >ptented algorithm. If you simply need the file you can go to >www.bouncycastle.org. If not, is there some function that is not >working as intended in Geornimo? > > > org.apache.geronimo.util.jce.X509V1CertificateGenerator appears > to be deprecated with no replacement > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Key: GERONIMO-3054 > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3054 > > Project: Geronimo > > Issue Type: Bug > > Security Level: public(Regular issues) > > Affects Versions: 1.1.1 > > Environment: All > > Reporter: Ken > > Priority: Minor > > > > Hello, all. I am looking at the source code for several files, > and one of them, > org.apache.geronimo.util.jce.X509V1CertificateGenerator has the > following tag & notice: > > /** > > * class to produce an X.509 Version 1 certificate. > > * > > * @deprecated use the equivalent class in org.apache.geronimo.util.x509 > > */ > > I (think I) have looked everywhere for a package named x509 under > util, or even a reference to when/how/why/to what it was changed, > but can't seem to find one. Where is this "replacement" class that > is mentioned in the deprecation? > >-- >This message is automatically generated by JIRA. >- >You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.