Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 39732 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2007 13:52:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Apr 2007 13:52:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 38823 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2007 13:52:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 38272 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2007 13:52:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 38261 invoked by uid 99); 24 Apr 2007 13:52:17 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 06:52:17 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of rickmcg@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.235 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.235] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (66.249.82.235) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 06:52:09 -0700 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so2124740wxc for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 06:51:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=RKtPtpvbWcr1sDPHsVTMuXvDnrtMfcdDDr7iOqIMurd8Dt5QrqlI3HoIyrX06VUCSPwgw49KYAtx6UxKnXyUiaA0N/TJRqc8tdbnnfS3xr432p/3StpNJNZbyiaqaOGcaSHkjnFt13JFLW/AAJmzxN5+ZtBNUUvznKwHWA08bzg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=AjXHBRErcY73mMlRRhOBtfwa4DtupHGqDSpjahAw1R1nDwuySdDWqrz+AeNY9ypYqyZpzS3Wr6IVhdwrEAgM2sGs3zLzZOWUS2CIaD+eVK2aGAEW7eaLLhx8yMvpreXds7zyfBIsyQuA/L0ZQsdfijffmxzZv0YXRMshVoypu6Q= Received: by 10.70.28.7 with SMTP id b7mr12439820wxb.1177422708926; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 06:51:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.101? ( [68.191.49.248]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i39sm16127851wxd.2007.04.24.06.51.47; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 06:51:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <462E0BBC.3050104@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 09:53:00 -0400 From: Rick McGuire Reply-To: rickmcg@gmail.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Yoko and java.endorsed.dirs question References: <462E09B7.7000209@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <462E09B7.7000209@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Donald Woods wrote: > What order should the paths be for java.endorsed.dirs? > Should it be - > 1) JDK's lib/endorsed before Geronimo's lib/endorsed > 2) Geronimo's lib/endorsed before the JDK's lib/endorsed > > I'm wondering due to the following warning/exception in the > geronimo-corba module - > "Incorrect level of org.omg.CORBA classes found. > Likely cause is an incorrect java.endorsed.dirs configuration" > > Don't we need the Yoko implementation in the endorsed classpath before > the JDK's implementation??? For the yoko code, I'm not sure it matters. The classes the yoko code overrides is contained in the base JVM, not in jar files contained in the endorsed dirs. Not including the yoko jars in the endorsed dirs is one potential cause of that error (and a frequent one for 2.0 until the CORBA support was fully enabled). There are other situations as well that can lead to that. Are you encountering the error, or just wondering because you saw the message in the yoko code? Rick > > -Donald