geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul McMahan <>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] 2.0-M5 (rc1) binaries available
Date Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:46:35 GMT
OK I was confused about the intent of these milestone releases and  
thought a -1 was appropriate given the impact of this regresssion.   
I'll go with a -0 then. Is it possible to crack open the binaries to  
update the release notes and mention that JSF is not available in  
this milestone?

Best wishes,

On Apr 26, 2007, at 1:12 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:

> On Apr 26, 2007, at 12:37 PM, Paul McMahan wrote:
>> This may be related to the changes made in https:// 
>>  It seems that there  
>> are some classloader related problems with the sql tags in jstl.
>> After trying out the M5 release candidate just now I needed to  
>> reopen that JIRA because the changes made for it in rev 532106  
>> prevent myfaces from seeing the jstl classes.
>> Unfortunately, since JSF is no longer working I must vote -1 on  
>> the M5 release.   Reverting 532106 locally fixed the JSF problem  
>> for me.
> Lots of things are broken still and this is just a point in time  
> statement of where we are at.  I'd agree that a regression is  
> unfortunate but the intent of the milestone is a peek at where  
> we're at on a monthly basis.  See my other post on unstables as I  
> think we're reading more into this being a release than we should.   
> Perhaps its confusing to users as well.

View raw message