geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sachin Patel <>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] 2.0-M5 (rc1) binaries available
Date Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:47:31 GMT
I would not have any objection to doing this.  The reason being we  
have no formal test process in place for our milestone drivers and GA  
releases as everyone has a different opinion as to what constitutes a  
+1.  Until we have a process in place and are in agreement of what  
defines a daily, integration, milestone, and GA release a non-voting  
weekly unstable driver is a good idea.


On Apr 26, 2007, at 1:05 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:

> Here is a question to ponder.  Would anyone object if I simply made  
> these binaries available from people as a monthly unstable  
> release?  Given the amount of time it takes to spin this up and  
> vote I'd rather just pick an svn version and make it available.  I  
> think it burns up a lot of people's time to follow the release  
> process.  Simply pop out the binary, let people play with it and if  
> things are broken there is always trunk.  Perhaps we could move to  
> a weekly unstable.
> Anyway, I'd like some thoughts on this.
> On Apr 26, 2007, at 2:39 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>> Starting DISCUSS thread if necessary for this release.

View raw message