geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] 2.0-M4 Binaries available (rc1)
Date Tue, 03 Apr 2007 21:06:12 GMT
We really should not be using the local repo like this... :-(

--jason


On Apr 3, 2007, at 1:57 PM, Donald Woods wrote:

> I'll upload the 11 Axis2 and 11 CXF artifacts into the M4 branches  
> local repo and update the pom.xml if someone will either respin/ 
> republish the build  for me or walk me through how to do it....:-)
>
> -Donald
>
> Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>> Can't argue with #2.  I can't see how these got picked up and it  
>> is sloppy.  I'm ok with knocking this set of binaries down.   
>> Although, I'm not sure I want to invest more time on this  
>> milestone as there are lots of functional pieces to fix.  Anyone  
>> else want to put together an M4 or shall we pass this month?
>> On Apr 3, 2007, at 1:51 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>>> I'm -1 on releasing as is because of (2).  I think our binaries  
>>> should be cleaner that that :-/
>>>
>>> I don't think (1) is significant.  There is no functional change  
>>> from applying the patch from GERONIMO-2941.
>>> (3) also doesn't bother me.
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> david jencks
>>>
>>> On Apr 3, 2007, at 2:57 AM, Rakesh Midha wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think we need to look into following issues:
>>>> 1. Initial startup error caused by https://issues.apache.org/ 
>>>> jira/browse/GERONIMO-2941
>>>>
>>>> 2. Why is that in console's Application section and deployment  
>>>> list-module, I see all the modules twice?
>>>> One with the version 2.0-M4, appears as started and one with  
>>>> version 2.0-M4-SNAPSHOT stopped. All the modules also have two  
>>>> folders for two versions.
>>>> Its not causing any error or exception, but i am just worried as  
>>>> this result in larger size of zip/gz and installed folder, and  
>>>> may also have other effects.
>>>>
>>>> 3. Shutdown error.
>>>>
>>>> thanks
>>>> Rakesh
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 4/3/07, *Jacek Laskowski* <jacek@laskowski.net.pl  
>>>> <mailto:jacek@laskowski.net.pl> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     +1
>>>>
>>>>     Jacek
>>>>
>>>>     On 4/1/07, Matt Hogstrom < matt@hogstrom.org
>>>>     <mailto:matt@hogstrom.org>> wrote:
>>>>     > I have placed the 2.0-M4 binaries out on http:// 
>>>> people.apache.org/
>>>>     > ~hogstrom/2.0-M4-rc1 for you to take a look at.  (They are
>>>>     uploading
>>>>     > as I write this).
>>>>     >
>>>>     > I have done some testing with DayTrader.  There is an  
>>>> issue in
>>>>     > connecting with he MDB container which still needs to be  
>>>> worked out
>>>>     > so the application will not deploy as is.  However, given the
>>>>     scopwe
>>>>     > of function DayTrader covers as well as all the late code  
>>>> drops I
>>>>     > don't see an issue with that.  Smaller samples should be  
>>>> ok and
>>>>     tests
>>>>     > look good.  Given that we're in the final stages of  
>>>> testing I'd
>>>>     like
>>>>     > to get this Milestone on the wire as is and fix issues in  
>>>> trunk.
>>>>     > Users that pull this binary and report issues will help us  
>>>> in the
>>>>     > Drive to 5.
>>>>     >
>>>>     > Other than that limitation I think this Milestone looks ready
>>>>     to go.
>>>>     >
>>>>     > After reviewing the content please cast your vote.
>>>>     >
>>>>     > [ ] +1 - Release these binaries
>>>>     > [ ]   0
>>>>     > [ ] -1 Do not release these binaries (provide reason)
>>>>     >
>>>>     > This vote will conclude on April 4th at 0600 Eastern.
>>>>     >
>>>>     > Thanks!
>>>>     >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     --
>>>>     Jacek Laskowski
>>>>     http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
>>>>
>>>>
>>>


Mime
View raw message