geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Dillon <>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] 2.0-M4 Binaries available (rc1)
Date Tue, 03 Apr 2007 21:27:35 GMT
On Apr 3, 2007, at 2:18 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> On Apr 3, 2007, at 4:57 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>> I'll upload the 11 Axis2 and 11 CXF artifacts into the M4 branches  
>> local repo and update the pom.xml if someone will either respin/ 
>> republish the build  for me or walk me through how to do it....:-)
> Donald, excellent and I appreciate it.
> I would checkout the 2.0-M4 in branches to start with.  There must  
> be some lingering issue in hte build or we somehow picked up the  
> SNAPSHOT though some transitive dependencies.
> If you like I can provide you with the repo I used for this build.   
> It may be possible to address Alan's concern about being able to  
> rebuild as well.
> Although, personally I think the time invested in 2.0 is better  
> spent than waving a dead chicken on 2.0-M4.  By the time it get  
> built and voted on we'll be into next week most likely with the  
> next milestone a few weeks away.
> I think a better solution would be to simply create an unstable set  
> and put them up on
> Other's thoughts?

I would just put up the assembly bin-* bits for folks to play with  
and then not worry about the rest.  M5 will be here soon enough.  As  
long as we can learn from what was wrong with M4 and incorporate the  
fixes (to code, process, whatever) into M5 then we are making progress.

Though now I have a wonderful image of Matt twirling a dead chicken  
over his head.  Can we get a dead chicken for J1 and get Matt to  
reenact this?  I'd like to get that on video :-)


View raw message