geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Anita Kulshreshtha <a_kuls...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: svn commit: r527746 - in /geronimo/server/trunk: assemblies/geronimo-boilerplate-minimal/src/main/resources/var/config/ modules/geronimo-deploy-tool/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/deployment/ modules/geronimo-deploy-tool/src/main/java/org/apache/ger...
Date Thu, 12 Apr 2007 12:22:30 GMT

--- Donald Woods <dwoods@apache.org> wrote:

> And how does the portOffset relate to this?  If you start with 1098, 
> isn't the next server instance going to use 1099 and the next one
> 1100? 
>   If so, why not start with 1099 and let the next one use 1100 and
> then 
> 1101?
> 
> It's not clear to me either why the RMI port default needs to be 
> changed....  Do we not want one RMI registry to be shared by all
> server 
> instances?
>
   The portoffset should be chosen such that there are no port
conflicts. Which will rule out portOffset=1. Usually portOffsets are
chosen 100, 200,.. or 1000, 2000, etc. For current port assignments
10,20,30... should also work. I have tested with 10.

Thanks
Anita

 


       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate 
in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545367

Mime
View raw message