geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rick McGuire <rick...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: svn commit: r527746 - in /geronimo/server/trunk: assemblies/geronimo-boilerplate-minimal/src/main/resources/var/config/ modules/geronimo-deploy-tool/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/deployment/ modules/geronimo-deploy-tool/src/main/java/org/apache/ger...
Date Thu, 12 Apr 2007 12:34:57 GMT
This change has completely broken the ability to run any of the TCK 
interoperability tests. 

Rick

Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
> --- Donald Woods <dwoods@apache.org> wrote:
>
>   
>> And how does the portOffset relate to this?  If you start with 1098, 
>> isn't the next server instance going to use 1099 and the next one
>> 1100? 
>>   If so, why not start with 1099 and let the next one use 1100 and
>> then 
>> 1101?
>>
>> It's not clear to me either why the RMI port default needs to be 
>> changed....  Do we not want one RMI registry to be shared by all
>> server 
>> instances?
>>
>>     
>    The portoffset should be chosen such that there are no port
> conflicts. Which will rule out portOffset=1. Usually portOffsets are
> chosen 100, 200,.. or 1000, 2000, etc. For current port assignments
> 10,20,30... should also work. I have tested with 10.
>
> Thanks
> Anita
>
>  
>
>
>        
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate 
> in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.
> http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545367
>
>   


Mime
View raw message