geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Donald Woods <dwo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] 2.0-M4 Binaries available (rc1)
Date Tue, 03 Apr 2007 20:57:31 GMT
I'll upload the 11 Axis2 and 11 CXF artifacts into the M4 branches local 
repo and update the pom.xml if someone will either respin/republish the 
build  for me or walk me through how to do it....:-)

-Donald

Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> Can't argue with #2.  I can't see how these got picked up and it is 
> sloppy.  I'm ok with knocking this set of binaries down.  Although, I'm 
> not sure I want to invest more time on this milestone as there are lots 
> of functional pieces to fix.  
> 
> Anyone else want to put together an M4 or shall we pass this month?
> 
> 
> 
> On Apr 3, 2007, at 1:51 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> 
>> I'm -1 on releasing as is because of (2).  I think our binaries should 
>> be cleaner that that :-/
>>
>> I don't think (1) is significant.  There is no functional change from 
>> applying the patch from GERONIMO-2941.
>> (3) also doesn't bother me.
>>
>> thanks
>> david jencks
>>
>> On Apr 3, 2007, at 2:57 AM, Rakesh Midha wrote:
>>
>>> I think we need to look into following issues:
>>> 1. Initial startup error caused by 
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2941
>>>
>>> 2. Why is that in console's Application section and deployment 
>>> list-module, I see all the modules twice?
>>> One with the version 2.0-M4, appears as started and one with version 
>>> 2.0-M4-SNAPSHOT stopped. All the modules also have two folders for 
>>> two versions.
>>> Its not causing any error or exception, but i am just worried as this 
>>> result in larger size of zip/gz and installed folder, and may also 
>>> have other effects.
>>>
>>> 3. Shutdown error.
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> Rakesh
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/3/07, *Jacek Laskowski* <jacek@laskowski.net.pl 
>>> <mailto:jacek@laskowski.net.pl> > wrote:
>>>
>>>     +1
>>>
>>>     Jacek
>>>
>>>     On 4/1/07, Matt Hogstrom < matt@hogstrom.org
>>>     <mailto:matt@hogstrom.org>> wrote:
>>>     > I have placed the 2.0-M4 binaries out on http://people.apache.org/
>>>     > ~hogstrom/2.0-M4-rc1 for you to take a look at.  (They are
>>>     uploading
>>>     > as I write this).
>>>     >
>>>     > I have done some testing with DayTrader.  There is an issue in
>>>     > connecting with he MDB container which still needs to be worked out
>>>     > so the application will not deploy as is.  However, given the
>>>     scopwe
>>>     > of function DayTrader covers as well as all the late code drops I
>>>     > don't see an issue with that.  Smaller samples should be ok and
>>>     tests
>>>     > look good.  Given that we're in the final stages of testing I'd
>>>     like
>>>     > to get this Milestone on the wire as is and fix issues in trunk.
>>>     > Users that pull this binary and report issues will help us in the
>>>     > Drive to 5.
>>>     >
>>>     > Other than that limitation I think this Milestone looks ready
>>>     to go.
>>>     >
>>>     > After reviewing the content please cast your vote.
>>>     >
>>>     > [ ] +1 - Release these binaries
>>>     > [ ]   0
>>>     > [ ] -1 Do not release these binaries (provide reason)
>>>     >
>>>     > This vote will conclude on April 4th at 0600 Eastern.
>>>     >
>>>     > Thanks!
>>>     >
>>>
>>>
>>>     --
>>>     Jacek Laskowski
>>>     http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
>>>
>>>
>>
> 

Mime
View raw message