Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 81727 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2007 16:00:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Mar 2007 16:00:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 11674 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2007 16:00:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 11619 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2007 16:00:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 11608 invoked by uid 99); 6 Mar 2007 16:00:12 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 08:00:12 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of goyathlay.geronimo@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.230 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.184.230] (HELO wr-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.184.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 08:00:01 -0800 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 36so2364395wra for ; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 07:59:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Vn9d9LQSjfIaw3OGvIz+3Va8YRXLSFBSWQu3etZCSqZlhI5TSOvkK6VbSb3g9HI9X16vNXVRyBGQSFf0tguTif+1/ui+zmOOr53FgJn//B0yKcc9yGXGwqQ/6xPKXlv1mX6PiqZyaDvfrmANxOfgVh8LmyisnB2ViLA+//0gLfk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=oG0FACZxYssk4Dw0XJs20qPs1DT/xxIRxxAjTqNJx9i7ndhbeNT4dQNTc/jMNjFoBigxugIUiCASyzpUDID4AKeffz1lmAvb3cG93DKqeysnvdyZC7+27qFA6PgSLAiOTcCYv7MUfSsus1h7J2/7G9PHE2tKm2l+uQsJ+o5jN1o= Received: by 10.114.254.1 with SMTP id b1mr1778327wai.1173196780497; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 07:59:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.115.73.5 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 07:59:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 10:59:40 -0500 From: "Prasad Kashyap" To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: build a war file using maven when web.xml is not there In-Reply-To: <45ECF4EE.8030707@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45ECF4EE.8030707@gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I believe Jarek is including a testcase in the webservices-testsuite which is testing the deployment of optional DDs. Cheers Prasad On 3/5/07, Lin Sun wrote: > FYI - > > I have seeing a maven failure when building a war file and web.xml is > not there in the project for the purpose to test we support optional > web.xml. > > And there is already a maven feature request for this - > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MWAR-30 > > Seems this will be an important feature for us to have to test this > optional web.xml feature in Java EE 5 tho. :-( > > Lin > >