Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of jason.dillon@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.166.181 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer:sender;
        b=KXWvq4HMKI94njIQehu0k9/MuvxNrvha+b1K8n5/DFSOmj1MpiAj45cNLeC/S9JlhDc8Z6615jGyfAb9PfvrEXMBCUChCuZog9hbYHy6ESAd+/HQS7i4uiWM3RPUclSYSCdH8XPPGHw0PpwRf1bCPY0EStlbzeSY5nL5ANC8gJ4=
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
In-Reply-To: <961DA856-DEAB-4F30-A9ED-8FCA46DB82DB@gmail.com>
References: <0CB35396-E069-4D49-AC49-60991C96D2E4@planet57.com>
 <22202A20-E11D-4C70-9E76-88AB70A3F9EB@gmail.com>
 <33C1C5CF-EEB3-4033-961C-DC884F1E8AD4@planet57.com>
 <961DA856-DEAB-4F30-A9ED-8FCA46DB82DB@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <E811D29F-041B-47F3-A6DE-24D29F102575@planet57.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com>
Subject: Re: org.apache.j2g
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 13:31:35 -0700
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Sender: Jason Dillon <jason.dillon@gmail.com>

Yes, I know its not Mavenized, which is another of my concerns.  But  
regaurdless of that, it seems fairly simply to just opened up the  
project in an IDE, repackage, then search/replace everything else to  
pick up the correct package names now...

But... just as long as it gets done soonish, before we start getting  
folks using this tool.

--jason


On Mar 26, 2007, at 1:22 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:

> True, but this thing isn't even mavenized yet.  So publishing is  
> not a concern for me right now.  But I will mark this as a todo.
>
> -sachin
>
>
> On Mar 26, 2007, at 4:19 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>
>> I'm fine to wait to change this a little longer... but as soon as  
>> we have to start producing artifacts, publishing to repos or  
>> making assemblies then this should be fixed.
>>
>> But is it really that muck work to do a global search and replace  
>> "org.apache.j2g" -> "org.apache.geronimo.j2g" ?  I do this all the  
>> time with jEdit... its quite simple and quick.
>>
>> --jason
>>
>>
>> On Mar 26, 2007, at 1:12 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah we should insert ".geronimo" before j2g, but I just got done  
>>> refactoring alot of stuff and don't want to spend the time  
>>> redoing it all overagain. Its not just the packages that would  
>>> have to get changed again, but bundle id's, manifest references,  
>>> extension points, etc...
>>>
>>> Since Its currently in sandbox, we can just make it a requirement  
>>> before we move it out of sandbox.
>>>
>>> -sachin
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mar 26, 2007, at 4:02 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>>>
>>>> I asked about this before, but got no answer.
>>>>
>>>> Why is the code for "geronimo/sandbox/j2g" using  
>>>> "org.apache.j2g" as a package name?  This seems *very*  
>>>> inconsistent wrt other codelines which are hosted by the  
>>>> geronimo svn.
>>>>
>>>> Why?
>>>>
>>>> --jason
>>>
>>
>