Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 94270 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2007 20:40:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Mar 2007 20:40:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 66198 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2007 20:41:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 66142 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2007 20:41:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 66130 invoked by uid 99); 27 Mar 2007 20:41:03 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:41:02 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of hcunico@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.233 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.233] (HELO nz-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.162.233) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:40:54 -0700 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id j2so2122402nzf for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:40:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=PSYupJFk/tymd01mk54MPtvt4PA6I4Fwm5YZOKNU6vispTPrjMvoJqGD106dGMWT6Mn2h5TneaVVWl+R6Ck95+LRuARf+YWB3G4fr/GqKAS3HkyguSdGnIxsFQvtP/5vAWvHBzIx4OlmOwdOErGPwGrIF0S6/83WgrpurERXxj4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=D3uT0sFQJXtEfmL3jN/0DoiCuMcUGMlv+LgdWqhan22waO9GkZXwYZHwI5aMwOZ7oyaH/lIkA8yPGT02siwEE5IhOMG6yheApC09EWLcnX3guVh7pNl5KWplOSaOrm++F/hw90jkGHhVr3Ijgje3FlBVgKx2dt3njrjBqUepkEk= Received: by 10.35.81.1 with SMTP id i1mr14862118pyl.1175028033672; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:40:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?9.27.152.132? ( [129.33.49.251]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f78sm18559280pyh.2007.03.27.13.40.33; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:40:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4609813F.50506@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 16:40:31 -0400 From: Hernan Cunico User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: [BRANCH NOTICE] 0900 ET on Wednesday March 29 for 2.0-M4 References: <3DFC65A4-76BF-495F-8206-25FB2ADF1245@hogstrom.org> In-Reply-To: <3DFC65A4-76BF-495F-8206-25FB2ADF1245@hogstrom.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I would like the deploy new apps portlet working, it fails on both Jetty and Tomcat. Currently only command line works. Cheers! Hernan Matt Hogstrom wrote: > I had previously posted a note that in looking at the Subject it was not > clear the intent. So...based on where we are at I'm going to suggest a > 24-hour branch notice that will allow Milestone 4 to be packaged up be > made available a few days later. > > If there are outstanding issues please post back to this thread. Unless > there are any objections I'll proceed on the proposed branch timeframe. > > Anyone interested in co-piloting ? >