Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Message-ID: <33161636.1172782671085.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 12:57:51 -0800 (PST)
From: "David Jencks (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Created: (GERONIMO-2917) All the spec jars should be in
 jee-spec config.  Might not be ideal for the app client but simplifies
 build management
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

All the spec jars should be in jee-spec config.  Might not be ideal for the app client but simplifies build management
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: GERONIMO-2917
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2917
             Project: Geronimo
          Issue Type: Bug
      Security Level: public (Regular issues)
    Affects Versions: 2.0-M3
            Reporter: David Jencks
         Assigned To: David Jencks
             Fix For: 2.0-beta2


some spec jars aren't in the jee-spec config.  It might be better to have 2 modules, one shared between client and server and the other for the server-only specs, but lets have just one until we get certified.
missing specs I have found so far:

geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec
geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec vs geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail
geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec
myfaces-api


-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.