Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 39159 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2007 22:30:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Mar 2007 22:30:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 67303 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2007 22:30:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 67248 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2007 22:30:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 67225 invoked by uid 99); 6 Mar 2007 22:30:32 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:30:32 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of eljotpl@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.169] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:30:21 -0800 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so480321ugc for ; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:30:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=itceHi7l/rjjYopNb79iJZWMx1t9+7/Otq1///qMPHeA9pg3jMjHmvEjfl3bQrINYAiNiIQzXsjNOYctxrbCAo31UuFK8ycDITcgLQ7EbbsoUS2A02pkg6CHkkTcofEdY1HMwweFdr6XefCihA2SELv8P9OBZKsFTsNR7BA97H4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=dlIRRkp+uq2v6eKd7zYSxEA521sKAIJKPErRqRR/GlwGfK4Lg4S3Hr1GeiV5NkfAyUJa1X670VDSrd2/PtyzkV8GKh+nYssnYONuT6/lDdIWCbwj+ul6oZsudnZ0toAI0oLfDAQakFDjy2O4fcYyiTeo+I/cEaMRSjdAwEcWLxg= Received: by 10.114.205.1 with SMTP id c1mr1936642wag.1173220198721; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:29:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.193.10 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 14:29:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1b5bfeb50703061429h66edc8d7i257ba1668dac651f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 23:29:58 +0100 From: "Jacek Laskowski" Reply-To: jacek@laskowski.net.pl Sender: eljotpl@gmail.com To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-javamail_2.4_spec-1.3 In-Reply-To: <45EC164D.3070402@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45EC164D.3070402@gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: a8bbfaadd8a32f46 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 3/5/07, Rick McGuire wrote: > I hereby propose we release this branch and it's binaries as final. Sorry for hijacking the vote thread, but I wonder why https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-javamail_1.3.1_spec-1.3/README.txt mentions about 'JavaMail Specification 1.4'. Shouldn't the version numbers be the same? Jacek -- Jacek Laskowski http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl