Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 96604 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2007 17:34:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2007 17:34:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 77518 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2007 17:34:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 77477 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2007 17:34:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 77466 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2007 17:34:23 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Mar 2007 10:34:23 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.97.132.74] (HELO spaceymail-a2.g.dreamhost.com) (208.97.132.74) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Mar 2007 10:34:12 -0700 Received: from [192.168.15.102] (cpe-76-167-174-30.socal.res.rr.com [76.167.174.30]) by spaceymail-a2.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F8BB106247 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2007 10:33:51 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) In-Reply-To: <50EDC111-B307-4B91-AAF7-82BDA2644A09@gmail.com> References: <3ED9E2CA-815C-46E6-8C75-451D0ACEC594@iq80.com> <50EDC111-B307-4B91-AAF7-82BDA2644A09@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <000D7275-4CE8-49B1-98FD-A1B4F6838A12@iq80.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Dain Sundstrom Subject: Re: MDBs working in 2.0 Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 10:33:38 -0700 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mar 14, 2007, at 5:46 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: > > On Mar 14, 2007, at 3:53 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: > >> I believe that I have MDBs working in 2.0 (and the tck). In >> general they should work about as well as Stateless beans do, but >> haven't received as much testing. > > That's great. Nice stuff. > >> >> I also believe I have broken transaction recovery for the time being. > > K. Did you create a Jira so that we can keep track of this? Don't > want it to be forgotten... Some information on how it's broken > would be helpful. GERONIMO-2969 -dain