geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "James Strachan" <james.strac...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Getting ready for G 1.2 release?
Date Fri, 09 Mar 2007 10:22:44 GMT
FWIW the first RC of ActiveMQ 4.1.1 is available if you wanna try it out...

Maven 1 and 2 repos are located here:
http://people.apache.org/~chirino/activemq-4.1.1-RC1/

The release distributions are here:
http://people.apache.org/~chirino/activemq-4.1.1-RC1/maven2/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/4.1.1/

So I hope 4.1.1 will be out pretty soon (say by end of next week at the latest)


On 3/9/07, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I think the yoko release is on the way if not out.
>
> Jiras && my opinion:
>
> GERONIMO-433     Tolerate non-Sun JREs
> has anyone tried this? with yoko it ought to work
>
> Patch Available          GERONIMO-2289           GeronimoAsMavenServlet.java
> generates wrong default-repository element
> No idea
>
> GERONIMO-2697    OpenEJB schemas missing in Geronimo 1.2 distribution
> we should fix this.  Should be a 1 line change in some pom.
>
> GERONIMO-2672    Improving the Deployment schema documentation -
> geronimo-application.xsd
> no idea
>
> GERONIMO-2818    In-Place deployment does not interpret Manifest
> Class-Path entries correctly in JAR files
> I'd guess this is easy if someone can figure out what's going wrong,
> would be good to fix
>
> GERONIMO-2918    Have the ActiveMQ broker configured from an external
> configuration file by default
> I'm not sure this is such a great idea, but I'm not sure.  Actually I
> wonder about making an amq config builder that can read these files
> natively (and also gbeans etc).  This is probably too much for 1.2.
>
> GERONIMO-2927    Cannot rebuild Geronimo with external ActiveMQ XBean
> configuration because Spring Framework is missing
> This seems pretty important.  I think this involves adding spring to
> the amq-broker config and hiding it in the amq config, a couple
> minutes + testing.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
>
> On Mar 8, 2007, at 9:43 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>
> > I think we should start wrapping up the SNAPSHOT deps we have in
> > 1.2 to prepare for a release.  These are the ones I am aware of:
> >
> >     openejb 2.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT
> >     yoko 1.0-incubating-M2-SNAPSHOT
> >     activemq 4.1-SNAPSHOT
> >
> > ActiveMQ is on its way to releasing 4.1.1, which should be
> > available soonish (maybe sometime next week?).
> >
> > When can we get non-SNAPSHOT artifacts from OpenEJB and Yoko?
> >
> >  * * *
> >
> > There are also a few SNAPSHOT artifacts configured in  the
> > testsuite/*:
> >
> >     maven-invoker-plugin 1.0-SNAPSHOT
> >     maven-surefire-plugin 2.8-SNAPSHOT
> >
> > We don't even use the maven-invoker-plugin, so that can be
> > dropped.  And the maven-surefire-plugin is for TestNG support, and
> > there isn't much hope of getting that resolved any time soon.  But,
> > these don't need to be non-SNAPSHOT's for the release (would be
> > nice though) since this module is not included in the default build.
> >
> > I suppose we could include the maven-surefire-plugin 2.8-SNAPSHOT
> > (and its deps) in the repository module (using timestamp-build
> > versions).  But IMO its not a requirement or blocking issue for 1.2
> > releasability.
> >
> >  * * *
> >
> > There are also 8 unresolved JIRA's for 1.2:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?
> > reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/
> > field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=10220&fixfor=12310181
> >
> > Anyone know of any other issues which need to be wrapped up for
> > 1.2?  And/or if any of the above issues should be resolved/deferred
> > for another release?  If you have a moment, please take a peek.
> >
> > --jason
>
>


-- 

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/

Mime
View raw message