geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dain Sundstrom <d...@iq80.com>
Subject Re: Getting ready for G 1.2 release?
Date Fri, 09 Mar 2007 15:18:29 GMT
David,

If you want to fix these, that is cool.  Otherwise, they can get  
fixed in a point release.

-dain

On Mar 8, 2007, at 7:47 PM, David Jencks wrote:

> I think the yoko release is on the way if not out.
>
> Jiras && my opinion:
>
> GERONIMO-433  	 Tolerate non-Sun JREs
> has anyone tried this? with yoko it ought to work
>
> Patch Available  	 GERONIMO-2289  	 GeronimoAsMavenServlet.java  
> generates wrong default-repository element
> No idea
>
> GERONIMO-2697  	 OpenEJB schemas missing in Geronimo 1.2 distribution
> we should fix this.  Should be a 1 line change in some pom.
>
> GERONIMO-2672  	 Improving the Deployment schema documentation - 
> geronimo-application.xsd
> no idea
>
> GERONIMO-2818  	 In-Place deployment does not interpret Manifest  
> Class-Path entries correctly in JAR files
> I'd guess this is easy if someone can figure out what's going  
> wrong, would be good to fix
>
> GERONIMO-2918  	 Have the ActiveMQ broker configured from an  
> external configuration file by default
> I'm not sure this is such a great idea, but I'm not sure.  Actually  
> I wonder about making an amq config builder that can read these  
> files natively (and also gbeans etc).  This is probably too much  
> for 1.2.
>
> GERONIMO-2927  	 Cannot rebuild Geronimo with external ActiveMQ  
> XBean configuration because Spring Framework is missing
> This seems pretty important.  I think this involves adding spring  
> to the amq-broker config and hiding it in the amq config, a couple  
> minutes + testing.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
>
> On Mar 8, 2007, at 9:43 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>
>> I think we should start wrapping up the SNAPSHOT deps we have in  
>> 1.2 to prepare for a release.  These are the ones I am aware of:
>>
>>     openejb 2.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT
>>     yoko 1.0-incubating-M2-SNAPSHOT
>>     activemq 4.1-SNAPSHOT
>>
>> ActiveMQ is on its way to releasing 4.1.1, which should be  
>> available soonish (maybe sometime next week?).
>>
>> When can we get non-SNAPSHOT artifacts from OpenEJB and Yoko?
>>
>>  * * *
>>
>> There are also a few SNAPSHOT artifacts configured in  the  
>> testsuite/*:
>>
>>     maven-invoker-plugin 1.0-SNAPSHOT
>>     maven-surefire-plugin 2.8-SNAPSHOT
>>
>> We don't even use the maven-invoker-plugin, so that can be  
>> dropped.  And the maven-surefire-plugin is for TestNG support, and  
>> there isn't much hope of getting that resolved any time soon.   
>> But, these don't need to be non-SNAPSHOT's for the release (would  
>> be nice though) since this module is not included in the default  
>> build.
>>
>> I suppose we could include the maven-surefire-plugin 2.8-SNAPSHOT  
>> (and its deps) in the repository module (using timestamp-build  
>> versions).  But IMO its not a requirement or blocking issue for  
>> 1.2 releasability.
>>
>>  * * *
>>
>> There are also 8 unresolved JIRA's for 1.2:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa? 
>> reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/ 
>> field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=10220&fixfor=12310181
>>
>> Anyone know of any other issues which need to be wrapped up for  
>> 1.2?  And/or if any of the above issues should be resolved/ 
>> deferred for another release?  If you have a moment, please take a  
>> peek.
>>
>> --jason
>


Mime
View raw message