geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dan Diephouse" <...@envoisolutions.com>
Subject Re: JAXB upgrade
Date Mon, 05 Mar 2007 16:29:14 GMT
Yes, I will try to take care of this today (granted it might not get checked
in until later today though). Cheers,
- Dan

On 3/5/07, Jarek Gawor <jgawor@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Would it be possible for CXF folks to decide this issue soon? In
> Geronimo land we are kind of stuck right now (we have CXF disabled
> from the build because of the JAX-WS/JAXB issues) we are not making a
> lot of progress now in terms of intergration and testing.
>
> Thanks,
> Jarek
>
> On 3/2/07, Dan Diephouse <dan@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
> > I'm OK with rolling back for now. However the spec itself is final and
> the
> > RI impl is already out:
> >
> > https://jax-ws.dev.java.net/2.1/
> >
> > Everyone else ok with it?
> > Cheers,
> > - Dan
> >
> >
> > On 3/2/07, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > At this time Geronimo can only certify with JAXB 2.0 and JAXWS 2.0.
> > > We're hoping that sun will update the tck to allow supporting the 2.1
> > > specs, but as far as we can tell this has not yet happened.  Getting
> > > information out of sun about this stuff can be difficult, but perhaps
> > > if we started now and now and are sufficiently persistent we will
> > > eventually find out something useful.
> > >
> > > Are the 2.1 spec versions officially released?
> > >
> > > Meanwhile we'd certainly appreciate it at Geronimo if you went back
> > > to the 2.0 spec versions for now.
> > >
> > > thanks
> > > david jencks
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mar 1, 2007, at 7:43 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> > >
> > > > Oh... I didn't even realize you guys are targeting JAX-WS 2.1. Now,
> > > > I'm not sure how that affects things.
> > > >
> > > > Jarek
> > > >
> > > > On 3/1/07, Dan Diephouse <dan@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
> > > >> I'm happy to revert the change, but I think that we ultimately
> > > >> need it. I
> > > >> believe we're targeting JAX-WS 2.1 (we switched the API jar the
> > > >> other day),
> > > >> and that requires JAXB 2.1. There are many benefits from a user
> > > >> perspective
> > > >> in 2.1. For isntance it has a lot better functionality for things
> > > >> like WS-A
> > > >> and also makes it easier for people to use substitution types,
> which
> > > >> requires all sorts of hacks right now.
> > > >>
> > > >> Is Geronimo just looking to release JAX-WS 2.0 support or 2.1? Any
> > > >> idea if
> > > >> its possible to certify Geronimo with 2.1? Or does certification
> > > >> require 2.0?
> > > >> I'm not sure what the status is of the JAX-WS 2.1 TCK either.
> > > >>
> > > >> - Dan
> > > >>
> > > >> (I CC'd dev@geronimo in, hope thats ok)
> > > >>
> > > >> On 2/28/07, Jarek Gawor <jgawor@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Hi again,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > CXF code was recently upgraded to JAXB 2.1 and so I tired to
> figure
> > > >> > out what sort of implications that might have on Geronimo. First
> of
> > > >> > all, JAXB is one of those libraries that is shared by all
> > > >> applications
> > > >> > in the Geronimo server. We also have a bunch of different
> > > >> components
> > > >> > using JAXB to do deployment descriptor parsing, etc. So if we
> > > >> upgrade
> > > >> > JAXB in G, we have to retest all these subcomponents to make
> > > >> sure they
> > > >> > are ok. And I think in general  that should be ok but
> > > >> potentially time
> > > >> > consuming. Another potential issue that somebody raised was TCK
> > > >> > testing. We don't know what happens if for example TCK expects
> JAXB
> > > >> > 2.0 API but gets JAXB 2.1 API/implementation. Maybe nothing (as
> > > >> things
> > > >> > supposed to be backwards compatible) but maybe it blows up.
> That's
> > > >> > another thing for us to worry about.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > So, if this JAXB upgrade is not a critical issue for CXF would
> > > >> it be
> > > >> > possible to switch back to JAXB 2.0?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Thanks,
> > > >> > Jarek
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Dan Diephouse
> > > >> Envoi Solutions
> > > >> http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dan Diephouse
> > Envoi Solutions
> > http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
> >
>



-- 
Dan Diephouse
Envoi Solutions
http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog

Mime
View raw message