geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Dillon <>
Subject Re: org.apache.j2g
Date Mon, 26 Mar 2007 20:19:37 GMT
I'm fine to wait to change this a little longer... but as soon as we  
have to start producing artifacts, publishing to repos or making  
assemblies then this should be fixed.

But is it really that muck work to do a global search and replace  
"org.apache.j2g" -> "org.apache.geronimo.j2g" ?  I do this all the  
time with jEdit... its quite simple and quick.


On Mar 26, 2007, at 1:12 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:

> Yeah we should insert ".geronimo" before j2g, but I just got done  
> refactoring alot of stuff and don't want to spend the time redoing  
> it all overagain. Its not just the packages that would have to get  
> changed again, but bundle id's, manifest references, extension  
> points, etc...
> Since Its currently in sandbox, we can just make it a requirement  
> before we move it out of sandbox.
> -sachin
> On Mar 26, 2007, at 4:02 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>> I asked about this before, but got no answer.
>> Why is the code for "geronimo/sandbox/j2g" using "org.apache.j2g"  
>> as a package name?  This seems *very* inconsistent wrt other  
>> codelines which are hosted by the geronimo svn.
>> Why?
>> --jason

View raw message