geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Paul McMahan" <paulmcma...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: svn commit: r520132 - in /geronimo/server/trunk: ./ applications/console/geronimo-console-standard/src/main/resources/ assemblies/geronimo-boilerplate-jee5/ configs/activemq/ maven-plugins/car-maven-plugin/src/site/apt/ modules/ modules/ge-active
Date Wed, 21 Mar 2007 01:29:47 GMT
Yes those were hard times my friend...  5 chars could buy you pack of
twinkies and a warm blanket.


On 3/20/07, Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com> wrote:
> FYI, the size difference between "ge-activemq-rar" and "geronimo-
> activemq-ra" is 5 chars... are we really on such a slippery slop that
> 5 chars is going to kill us?  If we are then there is something else
> which is seriously broken (besides windows stupid limitation that is).
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Mar 20, 2007, at 4:20 PM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
>
> >    One of the places it happened was in daytrader config. The
> > following
> > path is 256 + 5:
> > C:\geronimo\geronimo-tomcat-j2ee-1.2-SNAPSHOT\repository\org\apache
> > \geronimo\daytrader\day
> >
> > trader-jetty-streamer-client\1.2-SNAPSHOT\daytrader-jetty-streamer-
> > client-1.2-SNAPSHOT.car
> >
> > \org.apache.geronimo.modules\ge-activemq-rar\1.2-SNAPSHOT\rar\META-
> > INF\MENIFEST.MF
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> > Anita
> >
> > --- Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Do you know specifically when this happens?  Is this because of
> >> including it in the car, and since cars are unpacked in the repo that
> >>
> >> it makes a horribly long path?
> >>
> >> --jason
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mar 20, 2007, at 2:17 PM, Paul McMahan wrote:
> >>
> >>> It's been a while but as I recall the module name was shortened
> >>> because after being deployed into the repository the path name to
> >> some
> >>> of its resources exceeded the maximum path length on windows.
> >>>
> >>> Best wishes,
> >>> Paul
> >>>
> >>> On 3/20/07, Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com> wrote:
> >>>> If there is an issue, I would rather look into fixing the cause
> >> not
> >>>> pollute the name.
> >>>>
> >>>> Why exactly would the name of this artifact cause path issues for
> >>>> windows?
> >>>>
> >>>> --jason
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mar 20, 2007, at 5:20 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> We might need to watch out for windows path length problems as a
> >>>>> result of this change -- they were the reason for the former
> >>>>> peculiar name.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> thanks
> >>>>> david jencks
> >>>>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > ______________
> > Need Mail bonding?
> > Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users.
> > http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396546091
>
>

Mime
View raw message