geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Dillon <>
Subject Re: Upgrade Pluto to 1.1? (was Re: What are we using Castor for?)
Date Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:27:04 GMT
Or... what about Jetspeed 2?  Again I know jack about all things  
portal so I have no idea... but I would like to have the console get  
to be more pluggable and dynamic to install plugin bits at runtime.


On Mar 2, 2007, at 10:52 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:

> On Feb 13, 2007, at 5:49 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>> It's used by pluto for the admin console.  No idea if more recent  
>> would work.
>> We could upgrade pluto too if anyone has some time to investigate
> I wonder if anyone from the Pluto team would want to help with  
> that... looks like 1.1 is not compatible with 1.0.1... but also  
> looks like that might not be a bad thing:
> <snip>
> Pluto 1.1 introduces a new container architecture. If you are  
> embedding Pluto in your portal, realize that 1.1 is not binarily  
> compatible with Pluto 1.0.x.
> Pluto 1.1 aims to simplify the architecture in order to make it  
> more user and developer friendly. You should find Pluto 1.1 easier  
> to get started with, easier to understand, and easier to embed with  
> your portal. Your feedback regarding how far we've come is always  
> welcome on the user and developer mailing lists!
> </snip>
> I don't know much abort portal muck, so I can't really show how  
> much better 1.1 might be... but I know that there have been some  
> issues with the console asis now to get stuff like plugin porlets  
> installed dynamically... perhaps 1.1 can help solve some of these  
> issues?
> Anyone know?
> --jason

View raw message