Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 53686 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2007 17:31:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Feb 2007 17:31:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 97852 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2007 17:31:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 97809 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2007 17:31:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 97798 invoked by uid 99); 5 Feb 2007 17:31:04 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 09:31:04 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.97.132.119] (HELO spaceymail-a2.g.dreamhost.com) (208.97.132.119) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 09:30:54 -0800 Received: from [192.168.15.102] (cpe-76-167-174-30.socal.res.rr.com [76.167.174.30]) by spaceymail-a2.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CB431061C7 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2007 09:29:58 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) In-Reply-To: References: <5eb405c70702012007va7cfe67x7657db12fe35628f@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <5B0918C3-B814-420B-A3C9-D09F85D30D2C@iq80.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Dain Sundstrom Subject: Re: in jetty-deployer plan.xml Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 09:29:44 -0800 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Tranql uses antlr, but there may be something else that does (maybe spring). -dain On Feb 4, 2007, at 3:13 AM, Gianny Damour wrote: > Hi Jarek, > > I think the Spring filter is a leftover of the time when the Jetty > module was used to import Spring to configure WADI. > > I do not know why antlr is there. As it is not directly imported by > Jetty6 poms, I think that we can also drop it. > > Thanks, > Gianny > > On 02/02/2007, at 3:07 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have a question about the following entry in the >> configs/jett6-deployer/src/plan/plan.xml: >> >> >> antlr. >> org.springframework. >> >> >> Is that still needed/necessary? tomcat6-deployer's plan.xml does not >> have such entry. So is this jetty specific? I believe this is causing >> problems for me with a WS client code that uses Spring API to >> configure itself (a WS client gets an automatic dependency on CXF >> which then has a dependency on the Spring API). >> >> Can someone please explain? >> >> Thanks, >> Jarek >