Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 62439 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2007 02:25:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Feb 2007 02:25:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 90886 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2007 02:25:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 90843 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2007 02:25:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 90832 invoked by uid 99); 9 Feb 2007 02:25:48 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 18:25:48 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.97.132.81] (HELO spaceymail-a2.g.dreamhost.com) (208.97.132.81) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 18:25:38 -0800 Received: from [192.168.15.102] (cpe-76-167-174-30.socal.res.rr.com [76.167.174.30]) by spaceymail-a2.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 074731061C5 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2007 18:25:17 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <3657284E-CE4F-430A-992F-89AFE3B78E16@iq80.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Dain Sundstrom Subject: Re: Exceptions during deployment of testsupport EARs Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 18:24:55 -0800 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Feb 8, 2007, at 6:17 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.GBeanAlreadyExistsException: GBean already > registered: geronimo:J2EEServer=geronimo,name=cmp,j2eeType=GBean This the PersistenceUnit naming problem I pointed out yesterday. The JPA deployer is not picking a very unique names and we quickly run into conflicts. -dain