geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Prasad Kashyap" <goyathlay.geron...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Creating a top level repo in the G trees
Date Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:40:43 GMT
OK. M3 changes done. Will do the same for trunk and 1.2.

Cheers
Prasad

On 2/27/07, Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com> wrote:
> I would leave the m3 branch alone... its not worth the effort to
> change things there... though you may want to merge the myfaces repo
> changes (configs/jasper) from trunk, to help with SNAPSHOT resolution
> when Mvn tries to perform updates.
>
> As for the rest of these, I mentioned a way to handle this in the
> short-term in a mail I sent about "Local module repos and SNAPSHOT
> artifacts".
>
>   * * *
>
> What's the motivation to do this to m3 (which is a very short-lived
> branch)?
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Feb 27, 2007, at 8:38 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>
> > In doing the release I've run into a few different repos scattered
> > in the tree.  I'd like to move those repos to a top level
> > repository directory for the tree.  This helps out so that any
> > artifacts that are related to a release are put in one place.
> >
> > Here is the list of repos:
> >
> > .//applications/console/geronimo-console-standard/repository
> > .//applications/console/geronimo-console-standard/src/main/java/org/
> > apache/geronimo/console/repository
> > .//applications/console/geronimo-console-standard/src/main/webapp/
> > WEB-INF/view/repository
> > .//applications/geronimo-dojo/repository
> > .//applications/geronimo-uddi-server/repository
> > .//configs/jasper/repository
> >
> > I would prefer to move these artifacts up to a top level ./
> > repository directory that is maintained as part of the tree and add
> > this repo at the root level.  I'm wondering if there is a specific
> > reason that they are located on a per module basis?
> >
> > I'm heading for a plane and will be disconnected for a while so if
> > someone has some spare cycles it would be most appreciated if this
> > could be done in the 2.0-M3 tree.
> >
> > I'd like to discuss this for trunk.
>
>

Mime
View raw message