geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dain Sundstrom <d...@iq80.com>
Subject Re: <hidden-classes> in jetty-deployer plan.xml
Date Tue, 06 Feb 2007 17:41:43 GMT
Before you do that, I'd make sure that antlr isn't in the server  
repo.  That way you will know that there isn't another library using  
it.  Antlr is very popular after all.

-dain

On Feb 6, 2007, at 5:54 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:

> Since we're not using the CMP generator of TranQL in 2.x I think we  
> can drop the Antlr reference as well.  Any objections?
>
> On Feb 5, 2007, at 12:29 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>
>> Tranql uses antlr, but there may be something else that does  
>> (maybe spring).
>>
>> -dain
>>
>> On Feb 4, 2007, at 3:13 AM, Gianny Damour wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jarek,
>>>
>>> I think the Spring filter is a leftover of the time when the  
>>> Jetty module was used to import Spring to configure WADI.
>>>
>>> I do not know why antlr is there. As it is not directly imported  
>>> by Jetty6 poms, I think that we can also drop it.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Gianny
>>>
>>> On 02/02/2007, at 3:07 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I have a question about the following entry in the
>>>> configs/jett6-deployer/src/plan/plan.xml:
>>>>
>>>>                <hidden-classes>
>>>>                    <filter>antlr.</filter>
>>>>                    <filter>org.springframework.</filter>
>>>>                </hidden-classes>
>>>>
>>>> Is that still needed/necessary? tomcat6-deployer's plan.xml does  
>>>> not
>>>> have such entry. So is this jetty specific? I believe this is  
>>>> causing
>>>> problems for me with a WS client code that uses Spring API to
>>>> configure itself (a WS client gets an automatic dependency on CXF
>>>> which then has a dependency on the Spring API).
>>>>
>>>> Can someone please explain?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Jarek
>>>
>>
>>
>


Mime
View raw message