geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dain Sundstrom <>
Subject Re: org.apache.geronimo.system.main.Daemon and commons-cli
Date Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:07:49 GMT
Say what?

Will -v, -vv and -vvv stop working?  If yes, then I don't think we  
should switch as what we have is currently working fine.


On Feb 27, 2007, at 12:20 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:

> I don't believe there is anything which prevents the syntax from  
> being the same... except, that the '-vv' and '-v' options end up  
> merging into one '-v' option, which can be specified more than one  
> to increase verbosity, so the usage of '-vv' is the same, but  
> technically there would be no '-vv' option, just a '-v'.
> --jason
> On Feb 27, 2007, at 9:48 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>> I don't care as long as you don't change the cli syntax.  IIRC the  
>> code originally used commons cli, but someone removed it because  
>> it wasn't flexible enough.  It was a very long time ago, so my  
>> memory is fuzzy.
>> -dain
>> On Feb 26, 2007, at 6:02 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>>> Anyone mind if I re-write org.apache.geronimo.system.main.Daemon  
>>> to use commons-cli to handle option processing?
>>> Use of commons-cli 1.0 add ~30k to the bootstrap classpath (uses  
>>> commons-lang, which is already there), and will greatly simplify  
>>> this code, and make it a little easier/nicer to add more command- 
>>> line options in the future as well as providing.
>>> --jason

View raw message