geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim McConnell <tim.mcco...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
Date Thu, 01 Feb 2007 15:46:38 GMT
The working version of JSF 1.2 is in:

svn checkout http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/current12


Paul McMahan wrote:
> I built from core/branches/jsf12
> 
> Best wishes,
> Paul
> 
> 
> On 1/31/07, Don Hill <justj2ee@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Paul,
>>
>> Sorry to chime in but what branch did you build myfaces 1.2 from ?
>>
>> Don
>>
>>
>> On 1/31/07, Paul McMahan < paulmcmahan@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I hope that Geronimo can use Myfaces for JSF since they are also an
>> > apache project.   I successfully built their 1.2 snapshot today with
>> > very little trouble (just disabled unit tests).   Then I included
>> > their jars in a JSF 1.2 web application and successfully deployed it
>> > to Geronimo.   The Myfaces engine successfully parsed the
>> > faces-config.xml and started the webapp.   I was able to access the
>> > webapp from my browser and interact with the JSF controls.   I think
>> > that they are close enough to providing a usable JSF 1.2 driver that
>> > we should continue to work with them for delivery in Geronimo 2.0.
>> >
>> > Best wishes,
>> > Paul
>> >
>> > On 1/31/07, Sachin Patel <sppatel2@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > Yes, I think we should consider this.  From what I hear its been 
>> weeks
>> since
>> > > My Faces has been able to build.  We could always swap back as 
>> soon as
>> My
>> > > Faces provides a driver.  I think we need this for the beta, and if
>> we're
>> > > going to do it, better now than later.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Jan 30, 2007, at 2:41 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
>> > >
>> > > I've seen several comments in the release notes and on the user list
>> about
>> > > MyFaces 1.2 not yet being functional in Geronimo 2.0.  Does 
>> anybody know
>> if
>> > > this will be functional soon and more specifically, if it will be
>> functional
>> > > in time for our 2.0 beta?
>> > >
>> > > Should we maybe be looking for an alternative for 2.0 (possibly
>> glassfish)?
>> > >
>> > > Joe
>> > >
>> > > -sachin
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>
> 

-- 
Thanks,
Tim McConnell

Mime
View raw message