geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Paul McMahan" <paulmcma...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] February Code drop (M3?)
Date Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:55:05 GMT
I agree it would be great to get another release out.  I also agree we
should stick with milestone or alpha releases until there's more
goodies in the gumbo.

Best wishes,
Paul

On 2/15/07, Matt Hogstrom <matt@hogstrom.org> wrote:
> We're getting to the end of February so its time to discuss what will
> drop and what we call it.  On the original set of goals this next
> drop would be beta-1 but based on recent e-mail discussions as well
> as IRC and some experimentation I think the soup needs a few more
> items before we turn the flame to simmer.  That said, I think that
> translates the February drop to be M3 rather than beta-1.
>
> We've improved deployment, made a lot of plumbing changes, etc so
> I'll solicit people's input for the highlights of this next Milestone
> (and if we al concur this is the right designation).  If we're all
> tracking on this then I'd plan to follow the previous plan of
> branching at around 1700 next Wednesday (ET) of course not disrupting
> trunk and the progress that is being made.  This would mean that we
> are settling into a monthly release in tune with release early and
> often (even if its not soup yet ;-)
>
> BEA recently announced that they have a developer release of WebLogic
> that has passed CTS so we're not alone out there in the world.  I
> have to admit it feels pretty good to be on the forming wave rather
> than paddling to catch one that has already left.
>
> As far as assemblies are concerned I recommend using the same
> assemblies we did for last month as I don't think Axis or Cayenne are
> really integrated enough yet for people to try out.  correct me if my
> understanding is not correct.
>
> Comments, and feedback welcome.
>
> Thanks
>
> Matt
>

Mime
View raw message