Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 1029 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2007 01:43:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2007 01:43:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 14004 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2007 01:44:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 13423 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2007 01:44:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 13412 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2007 01:44:02 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Jan 2007 17:44:02 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of david.blevins@visi.com designates 208.42.156.2 as permitted sender) Received: from [208.42.156.2] (HELO conn.mc.mpls.visi.com) (208.42.156.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Jan 2007 17:43:51 -0800 Received: from [192.168.42.22] (cpe-76-167-141-63.socal.res.rr.com [76.167.141.63]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by conn.mc.mpls.visi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C27810D for ; Fri, 5 Jan 2007 19:43:30 -0600 (CST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) In-Reply-To: <5CDBF49D-B4FE-4BB8-9692-3842FFBC85A6@yahoo.com> References: <5CDBF49D-B4FE-4BB8-9692-3842FFBC85A6@yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: David Blevins Subject: Re: possible 1.2 problem Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 17:43:22 -0800 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jan 5, 2007, at 4:31 PM, David Jencks wrote: > I fixed GERONIMO-2686 in 1.2 but have not been able to figure out > what if any openejb2 version is supposed to go with it. If the > openejb2 version exists and is not 2.3 (trunk) the changes may have > broken the openejb2 build. See rev 493187 in openejb2 Hopefully this will refresh your memory. Dec 14 15:18:21 you can do anything you want to the interfaces as long as you keep them compatible in 1.2 and 2.0m2 Dec 14 15:18:34 1.2 isn't frozen Dec 14 15:18:48 it's just been released as a beta Dec 14 15:20:29 ok Dec 14 15:20:37 so to reiterate, you can make any change you want to 2.3 as long is you make it work in 1.2 and 2.0-m1 Dec 14 15:20:42 err m2 Dec 14 15:20:47 ok Dec 14 15:20:52 and this is only temporary Dec 14 15:20:54 I think I can live with that Dec 14 15:20:59 like 2-3 weeks tops Dec 14 15:21:05 we hope :-) Dec 14 15:21:12 :) Dec 14 15:21:18 OK, thanks Dec 14 15:21:27 thanks david! http://www.uwyn.com/drone/log/bevinbot/geronimo/20061214 -David