Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 46462 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2007 20:37:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jan 2007 20:37:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 13970 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2007 20:37:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 13703 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2007 20:37:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 13692 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jan 2007 20:37:55 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 12:37:55 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.4] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 12:37:47 -0800 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A47717142DF for ; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 12:37:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2934135.1167770247670.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 12:37:27 -0800 (PST) From: "Jacek Laskowski (JIRA)" To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2684) Upgrade server trunk (2.0) to use the latest released geronimo-spec versions In-Reply-To: <19290412.1167746487692.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2684?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12461814 ] Jacek Laskowski commented on GERONIMO-2684: ------------------------------------------- If there're a patch for it, it'd surely be committed. Would you mind taking care of it? ;-) > Upgrade server trunk (2.0) to use the latest released geronimo-spec versions > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: GERONIMO-2684 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2684 > Project: Geronimo > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: public(Regular issues) > Components: specs > Affects Versions: 2.0-M2 > Reporter: Donald Woods > Fix For: 2.0-M2 > > > Several spec modules were released in the past week and 2.0 should be using them instead of the previous SNAPSHOT versions. > geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.0 > geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.0 > The following specs also are newer versions of ones currently being used in 2.0 - > geronimo-ejb_2.1_spec-1.1 > geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-1.1 > geronimo-j2ee-deployment_1.1_spec-1.1 > geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-1.1 > geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-1.1 > geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.1 > geronimo-jsp_2.0_spec-1.1 > geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.0 > geronimo-qname_1.1_spec-1.1 > geronimo-saaj_1.1_spec-1.1 > geronimo-servlet_2.4_spec-1.1 > Should the following new specs be included in the top-level pom? > geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec-1.0 > geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0-SNAPSHOT > geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0-SNAPSHOT -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira