Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 3259 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2007 19:21:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jan 2007 19:21:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 4562 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2007 19:21:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 4521 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2007 19:21:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 4510 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2007 19:21:48 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:21:48 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of paulmcmahan@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.174 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.174] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:21:39 -0800 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so708244ugc for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:21:14 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=G+r89fG7N/t8Ck2/K7egD/mtf9zCi8zki4ICBAuO5Y/m4m8/FZM4FIowdSl611C9jiinug7rsPlnQ6ratCYszv7kMG+Jj940sz+XdoRMr68iuXpeQsKS+YJ9cZIqk6maxDDCKX9H+VdJYYT7N3/nJrQMWA8+4o7DeaoL8Ssk1WM= Received: by 10.82.116.15 with SMTP id o15mr392643buc.1168543274129; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:21:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.156.9 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:21:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <21df75940701111121v181ad8b7o6913d032f1f56d14@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:21:13 -0500 From: "Paul McMahan" To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: 2.0-M1 configs in the maven snapshot repo In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <21df75940701111100u6d49a3e5p3a0ee26f7c54a6c1@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks! On 1/11/07, Jason Dillon wrote: > I can publish a new set of snaps in a few... waiting for my server > build to finish first to make sure its happy, then I will publish new > snaps. > > --jason > > > On Jan 11, 2007, at 2:00 PM, Paul McMahan wrote: > > > The 2.0-M1 configs published in the snapshot repo don't work with 2.0 > > any more because of the serialVersionUID added to GOperationInfo in > > rev487505. Looks like the configs were published one day before this > > change (just my luck). As a result, when I try to start a config > > imported from the snapshot repo I see : > > > > 13:28:12,673 ERROR [GBeanInstanceState] Error while starting; GBean is > > now in the FAILED state: > > abstractName="org.apache.geronimo.configs/servlet-examples-tomcat/ > > 2.0-M1-SNAPSHOT/car?configurationName=org.apache.geronimo.configs/ > > servlet-examples-tomcat/2.0-M1-SNAPSHOT/car" > > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.InvalidConfigException: Unable to > > deserialize GBeanState > > at > > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.SerializedGBeanState.loadGBeans > > (SerializedGBeanState.java:120) > > at > > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.SerializedGBeanState.getGBeans > > (SerializedGBeanState.java:65) > > [...] > > Caused by: java.io.InvalidClassException: > > org.apache.geronimo.gbean.GOperationInfo; local class incompatible: > > stream classdesc serialVersionUID = 5185515581104192976, local class > > serialVersionUID = -5593225815559931812 > > at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.initNonProxy > > (ObjectStreamClass.java:519) > > [...] > > > > I think that republishing the configs built from trunk to the snapshot > > repo would clear this up. What's the procedure for doing that? If > > someone wants to handle it then that would be just fine with me :-) > > But if I do it myself then are there things I should pay extra > > attention to? I don't want to break anyone's development environment. > > > > Best wishes, > > Paul > >